AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Sigma Computing · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Sigma Computing

11Judge labels
1First choices
3Negative labels
7 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
4 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Sigma Computing was named 4 times in Embedded analytics, where Metabase led with 22%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business60 of 73
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Mid-market28 of 72
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise58 of 69
0%5 labels
under the label threshold
In embedded analytics · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Sigma Computing for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Embedded analyticsData platform0%28 of 720%4under 10 labels · led by Metabase at 22%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Sigma Computing yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Sigma Computing across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00101
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K202002
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase2 labels1
Comparative4 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative11 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best Spreadsheet-Like Experience ... Cons: Custom pricing only, less mature embedding features than Sisense” Kimi K2 · Embedded analytics · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Spreadsheet UI on a cloud warehouse | Sigma” Kimi K2 · Embedded analytics · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Sigma Computing, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Sigma Computing was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Tableau7 of 110Not among the top eight
Metabase6 of 112Not among the top eight
Sisense6 of 112Not among the top eight
ThoughtSpot Embedded6 of 111Not among the top eight
Looker5 of 111Not among the top eight
Microsoft Power BI Embedded5 of 110Not among the top eight
Embeddable3 of 111Not among the top eight
GoodData3 of 111Not among the top eight
Power BI Embedded3 of 110Not among the top eight
Cumul.io2 of 111Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Sigma Computing. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 8 of the 11 answers that named Sigma Computing and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

embeddable.com6
holistics.io5
omni.co5
cube.dev4
thoughtspot.com4
astrato.io3
basedash.com3
knowi.com3
luzmo.com3
sigmacomputing.comYour site3

Thirty-six of the thirty-nine domain citations in answers naming Sigma Computing came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

holistics.io/blog/best-embedded-analytics-tools5
omni.co/articles/best-embedded-analytics-tools-20265
cube.dev/articles/best-embedded-analytics-platforms-20264
astrato.io/blog/embedded-bi-tools3
basedash.com/blog/best-embedded-analytics-platforms-compared-20263
embeddable.com/blog/top-embedded-analytics-platforms-for-user-facing-analytics3
luzmo.com/blog/embedded-analytics-tools3
embeddable.com/blog/disadvantages-of-embedded-analytics2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

sigmacomputing.com ranks 9 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Sigma Computing takes 0% of first choices and Metabase takes 22%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “embedded analytics platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “embedded analytics platforms”
9
Searches for its name, Google
9,900 a month (“sigma computing”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
248 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 67,518 a month
Searches its site ranks for
7,682 · 542 in the top three
Sites linking to it
3,080
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 28 of 72 in embedded analytics
Segment leader
22%
Metabase
First choices
1 across its categories
Named in
11 answers
Its own site cited
in 8 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on sigmacomputing.com
5,276
subdomains included
Content
1,486
counted in the table below
Documentation
3,601
Product · Integration
37 · 59
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog892112026-09-29Observability
Webinar or virtual event20902025-03-13
Case study10822026-09-10
News or press9612026-08-06
Comparison6132026-08-25
Conference or event5502026-05-01
Report or ebook3702025-10-02
Glossary or explainer2332026-09-25
Template or tool4undated
Podcast or video102020-06-12

Most recent

Events in person

Upcoming
Last twelve months

As the event pages on sigmacomputing.com state them, read September 28, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page sigmacomputing.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Sigma Computing

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Sigma Computing is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Sigma is the AI runtime for business. A governed platform where teams build and run AI apps and agents directly on live cloud warehouse data (Snowflake, Databricks, BigQuery, Redshift).
sigmacomputing.com/product/why-sigma
Free plan or trial
Free Trial sigmacomputing.com/product/why-sigma
Customers named
Seek DataFalconXWorkato
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, certifications, hosting

What Sigma Computing's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: sigmacomputing.com/product/why-sigma, sigmacomputing.com/product/sigma-for-dashboards, sigmacomputing.com/customers/sigma-computing-partners-with-seek-data, sigmacomputing.com/customers/falconx-accelerates-business-insights-with-sigma, sigmacomputing.com/customers/workato-turns-to-sigmas-input-tables-to-drive-its-business-forward. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Sigma Computing's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Sigma Computing, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Sigma Computing by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Sigma Computing is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Sigma Computing, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at sigmacomputing.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.