4 categories · Named, not rankedSecuronix
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Identity threat detection and response | Identity and access | 0% | 68 of 105 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Huntress Managed ITDR at 51% | |
| SOAR platforms | Security operations | 0% | 59 of 67 | 50% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Tines at 41% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Extended detection and response | Security operations | 0% | 38 of 58 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Defender XDR at 40% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Log management | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 70 of 73 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Datadog Log Management at 28% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
By model
How each model treated Securonix across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Exabeat / Securonix: As a layer *on top* of existing tools (Log-based XDR)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · XDR · negative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“"absolute trash... the sales pitch is slick but they fail to deliver anything worthwhile."” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Logs · negative prompt · hard negative
“these built-in SOAR platforms often suffer from "integration drift." ... Proceed with Caution” Gemini 3.5 Flash · SOAR · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Securonix, over the 13 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Securonix was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 12 of the 13 answers that named Securonix and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
Forty of the forty domain citations in answers naming Securonix came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
securonix.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Securonix takes 0% of first choices and Huntress Managed ITDR takes 51%.ShowHide
Search and answers
In search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 1,300 a month (“securonix”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 46 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 3,571 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 1,125 · 77 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 3,705
- Paid Google search
- 1 searches its ads show for, about 5 clicks and $13 a month (estimate)
In answers
This edition- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 13 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 12 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHide| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 936 | 15 | 2026-09-23 | SIEM, SOAR | |
| News or press | 593 | 4 | 2026-09-22 | SIEM, SOAR | |
| Conference or event | 231 | 8 | 2026-10-14 | XDR, MDR | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 27 | 1 | 2026-08-28 | SIEM | |
| Comparison | 14 | 1 | 2026-07-10 | SIEM, XDR | |
| Glossary or explainer | 14 | 0 | 2024-10-30 | SIEM, SOAR | |
| Case study | 5 | 0 | 2024-12-16 | ||
| Report or ebook | 5 | undated | SIEM | ||
| Template or tool | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-10-14Sans ai cybersecurity summit conference or event
- 2026-09-23Securonix iso iec 42001 blog
- 2026-09-23Allan gray strengthens detection coverage and automates response with securonix blog
- 2026-09-23Iso 42001 ai governance pilot production blog
- 2026-09-23Securonix synq browser threat intelligence blog
- 2026-09-23Ai has entered the soc governance has to catch up blog
Events in person
- November 30, 2026 to December 4, 2026H-ISAC Orbit of Trust Fall Summit 2026Tucson · attends
- October 26, 2026 to October 29, 2026FS-ISAC Americas Fall Summit 2026Austin, USA · attended
- September 18, 2026Securonix UnSummit Singapore 2026Pullman Singapore – Orchard, Singapore, Singapore, Singapore · hosted
- December 3, 2025 to December 5, 2025AISS 2025Hotel Pullman & Pride Plaza, Aerocity, New Delhi, India · hosted
As the event pages on securonix.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page securonix.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name SIEM (164); 26 name its categories the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Securonix
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Securonix is its own company.ShowHide
The company
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Security Analytics at Cloud Scale; comprehensive cybersecurity across SIEM, TDIR, UEBA, and SOAR on a scalable cloud platform.
- For
- Enterprises and MSSPs
- Price stated
- no program fees, free training, flexible billing options, and a competitive, simple pricing model securonix.com/partners
- Customers named
- Allan GrayRedington DigiGlassMaveric
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting
What Securonix's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: securonix.com, securonix.com/products, securonix.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Securonix's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Securonix, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Securonix by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Securonix is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Securonix, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.