AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform

5Judge labels
2First choices
0Negative labels
3 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform was named 1 time in Secure code training, where SecureFlag led with 26%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business55 of 87
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Mid-market37 of 97
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprise5 of 65
4%3 labels
under the label threshold
In secure code training · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Secure code trainingDeveloper platform0%37 of 970%1under 10 labels · led by SecureFlag at 26%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.510001
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase2 labels2
Comparative1 label1not counted in share
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative5 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Secure Code Warrior leads on language breadth and enterprise benchmarking.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Secure code training · comparative prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Veracode Security Labs3 of 51Not among the top eight
Avatao2 of 51Not among the top eight
Wizer2 of 50Not among the top eight
AppSecEngineer1 of 50Not among the top eight
CMD+CTRL Training1 of 50Not among the top eight
Codebashing1 of 50Not among the top eight
RansomLeak1 of 50Not among the top eight
SANS Developer Security Training1 of 50Not among the top eight
Security Compass1 of 50Not among the top eight
Security Innovation Application Security Training1 of 50Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 5 answers that named Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

peerspot.com4
ransomleak.com4
f6s.com3
securityjourney.com3
sourceforge.net3
appsecengineer.com2
g2.com2
gartner.com2
practical-devsecops.com2
sans.org2

Twenty-seven of the twenty-seven domain citations in answers naming Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

ransomleak.com/blog/best-secure-coding-training-20264
peerspot.com/categories/application-security-training3
f6s.com/software/category/secure-coding-training2
securityjourney.com/secure-development-training2
sourceforge.net/software/secure-code-training/for-enterprise2
application.security/1
appsecengineer.com/1
appsecengineer.com/blog/top-3-platforms-for-security-awareness-training-in-20261

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

securecodewarrior.com ranks 2 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform takes 0% of first choices and SecureFlag takes 26%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “secure code training platform”
2
Position for “secure code training platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Organic visits to its site
about 2,802 a month
Searches its site ranks for
785 · 42 in the top three
Sites linking to it
2,182
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
26 ads · 17 text, 9 video · 7 shown in the last 30 days

First shown October 2024, as SECURE CODE WARRIOR LIMITED, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 6 in the year, 20 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 37 of 97 in secure code training
Segment leader
26%
SecureFlag
First choices
2 across its categories
Named in
5 answers
Its own site cited
in 5 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on securecodewarrior.com
10,041
subdomains included
Content
1,193
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
36 · 3
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
News or press717undatedSecure code training, AI coding
Blog321102026-10-01IaC, Secure code training
Webinar or virtual event109undated
Case study1102026-01-06
Conference or event8undated
Report or ebook7undated
Podcast or video7undated
Comparison602022-02-08
Glossary or explainer502025-08-27
Template or tool202017-09-27

Events in person

Last twelve months

As the event pages on securecodewarrior.com state them, read October 5, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page securecodewarrior.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
AI Software Governance platform
securecodewarrior.com
For
For AI Governance; For C-Suite; For Engineering; For Security; For Learning & Development
securecodewarrior.com
Certifications
OWASP Top 10NISTPCI DSSCRANIS2
Customers named
SageKamer van KoophandelPaysafeEnvestnetJPMorgan ChaseNational Australia BankNetcetera AGWorkday
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting

What Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: securecodewarrior.com, securecodewarrior.com/plans, trust.securecodewarrior.com, securecodewarrior.com/product/learning, securecodewarrior.com/company/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at securecodewarrior.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.