Every category where a model named Scribe for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
IT documentation	IT operations and endpoint	0%	16 of 92	0%	11	accepted challenger
Process mining	IT operations and endpoint	0%	33 of 61	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Apromore at 19%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Scribe yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Scribe across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	2	1	3
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.20	0	2	2
Mistral Small	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	1	1	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	1	1	2
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct5 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative6 labelsNone

Budget-constrained5 labelsNone

Scale-constrained3 labelsNone

Negative5 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative24 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Provides comprehensive mining functionality and is suitable for organizations with a limited budget.” Llama 4 Maverick · Process mining · budget prompt · alternative

“Tango or Scribe | Teams that struggle to write guides.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · IT documentation · scale prompt · alternative

“Scribe (if you need quick, automated process documentation)” MiniMax M2.5 · IT documentation · budget prompt · alternative

“Technical SOPs / procedures | Scribe, Guidde (video-first)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · IT documentation · negative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Scribe, over the 24 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Scribe was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Notion18 of 243Not among the top eight

Confluence16 of 242Not among the top eight

Document36012 of 240Not among the top eight

IT Glue11 of 242Not among the top eight

Hudu10 of 245Not among the top eight

BookStack9 of 240Not among the top eight

GitBook8 of 241Not among the top eight

ClickUp Docs6 of 240Not among the top eight

Docusaurus4 of 240Not among the top eight

Guru4 of 240Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Scribe. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 22 of the 24 answers that named Scribe and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

ferndesk.com13

aimultiple.com8

ones.com8

clickup.com7

document360.com6

adoc-studio.app5

docsie.io5

g2.com5

us.fitgap.com5

guideflow.com4

Sixty-six of the sixty-six domain citations in answers naming Scribe came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

ferndesk.com/blog/best-it-documentation-software11

aimultiple.com/it-documentation-software8

document360.com/blog/it-documentation-software6

adoc-studio.app/blog/choosing-a-documentation-tool5

clickup.com/blog/it-documentation-software5

medium.com/@ivanpalii/6-best-it-documentation-software-tools-c6a6e10d0c464

proprofskb.com/blog/it-documentation-software4

syncmonkey.com/best-it-documentation-software4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

scribehow.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Scribe takes 0% of first choices and Hudu takes 17%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “it documentation platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “it documentation platforms”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 110,000 a month (“scribe”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 14,401 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 229,927 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 15,062 · 545 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 20,521
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

10 ads · 10 text · 0 shown in the last 30 days

First shown May 2025, as Colony Labs, Inc, verified.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 16 of 92 in IT documentation

Segment leader

17%

Hudu

First choices: 0 across its categories
Named in: 24 answers
Its own site cited: in 22 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on scribehow.com

1,265

subdomains included

Content

227

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

11 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days
Template or tool	99	undated
Comparison	52	undated
Glossary or explainer	39	undated
Case study	25	undated
Blog	6	undated
Webinar or virtual event	2	undated
Report or ebook	2	undated
Conference or event	1	undated
Podcast or video	1	undated

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page scribehow.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Scribe

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Scribe is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Workflow context for teams & AI agents
scribehow.com
For: teams & AI agents
scribehow.com
Price stated: Get Scribe free scribehow.com
Free plan or trial: Get Scribe free scribehow.com
Certifications: SOC 2 Type IIHIPAACCPAGDPRFERPA
Not stated on the pages read: Starting price, integrations, hosting, customers

What Scribe's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: scribehow.com, trust.scribehow.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Scribe's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Scribe, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Scribe by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Scribe is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Scribe, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.