AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › ScienceLogic · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

ScienceLogic

8Judge labels
0First choices
1Negative labels
4 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
4 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. ScienceLogic was named 4 times in AIOps, where New Relic led with 17%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business76 of 96
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Mid-market30 of 93
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise19 of 80
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
In aiops · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named ScienceLogic for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
AIOps platformsIT operations and endpoint0%30 of 930%4under 10 labels · led by New Relic at 17%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for ScienceLogic yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated ScienceLogic across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00101
Grok 4.2001102
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00101
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative3 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative8 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Leader in Forrester Wave” Grok 4.20 · AIOps · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as ScienceLogic, over the 8 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ScienceLogic was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Datadog8 of 83Not among the top eight
Dynatrace8 of 83Not among the top eight
BigPanda8 of 80Not among the top eight
New Relic5 of 81Not among the top eight
PagerDuty3 of 80Not among the top eight
IBM Instana2 of 80Not among the top eight
LogicMonitor2 of 80Not among the top eight
Motadata ObserveOps2 of 80Not among the top eight
OpenObserve2 of 80Not among the top eight
ServiceNow IT Operations Management2 of 80Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ScienceLogic. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 8 of the 8 answers that named ScienceLogic and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com5
gartner.com4
motadata.com4
reddit.com4
augmentcode.com3
dynatrace.com3
guideflow.com3
logicmonitor.com3
monday.com3
openobserve.ai3

Thirty-five of the thirty-five domain citations in answers naming ScienceLogic came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

motadata.com/blog/aiops-platforms4
g2.com/categories/aiops-platforms3
gartner.com/reviews/market/aiops-platforms3
guideflow.com/blog/aiops-tools3
logicmonitor.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/10018_G2_AIOps_Platforms_Summer_2024_update_v33
monday.com/blog/service/aiops-software3
zapier.com/blog/aiops-platform3
augmentcode.com/guides/what-is-aiops2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on sciencelogic.com
2,373
subdomains included
Content
1,043
counted in the table below
Documentation
1,074
Product · Integration
48 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog813262026-09-22Infra monitoring, APM
News or press13732026-09-15Observability
Case study2702026-01-06
Comparison2522026-09-03
Conference or event1002025-12-18APM
Webinar or virtual event902026-06-29
Report or ebook802025-07-10
Glossary or explainer802023-03-02
Podcast or video402026-05-04
Template or tool202025-10-06

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page sciencelogic.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as ScienceLogic

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as ScienceLogic; a claim can dispute any of them.
Cisco AppDynamics/ScienceLogic 1

Follow ScienceLogic

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

ScienceLogic is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
AI-driven observability and IT infrastructure monitoring platform
sciencelogic.com
For
IT staff
sciencelogic.com
Price stated
From $5 USD per device/month*; From $6 USD per device/month*; From $12 USD per device/month*; From $20 USD per device/month*; Please reach out to your ScienceLogic team for more information. sciencelogic.com/why-sciencelogic/pricing
Free plan or trial
14-day test drive sciencelogic.com
Certifications
FedRAMPEcoVadis JUL 2026 - CommittedAWS Advanced Technology PartnerCMMC CertifiedCSA STAR Level 2EU-US DPFISO/IEC 27001:2022NIST 800-53 Rev. 5
Hosting
SaaSPrivate/Public CloudOn-Prem
Customers named
DatabankRackspaceCDWWorld Wide TechnologyGDIT

What ScienceLogic's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: sciencelogic.com, sciencelogic.com/why-sciencelogic/pricing, trust.sciencelogic.com, sciencelogic.com/solutions/fedramp, sciencelogic.com/platform/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ScienceLogic's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ScienceLogic, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for ScienceLogic by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where ScienceLogic is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name ScienceLogic, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at sciencelogic.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.