IT AI Index

Index › Vendors › Scaleway · September 2026 Edition

3 categories · Named, not ranked

Scaleway

5Judge labels

0First choices

2Negative labels

5 of 12Models named it

3Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

4 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Scaleway was named 4 times in Object storage and 2 other categories, where Backblaze B2 led with 46%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market36 of 46

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In object storage · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Scaleway for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Object storage	Cloud and infrastructure	0%	36 of 46	50%	2	under 10 labels · led by Backblaze B2 at 46%
Cloud hosting	Cloud and infrastructure	0%	37 of 78	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Amazon Web Services at 29%
Managed relational databases	Data platform	0%	47 of 73	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Amazon RDS at 32%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Scaleway yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Scaleway across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative5 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Competitive per\u2011vCPU rates, good for EU\u2011centric companies | Fewer integrations than AWS/Azure” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Managed databases · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Major issues: Data loss reported, especially with GLACIER storage class” MiniMax M2.5 · Object storage · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Scaleway, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Scaleway was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Vultr3 of 50Not in the top three

Cloudflare R22 of 52Not in the top three

Amazon S32 of 51Not in the top three

Azure Blob Storage2 of 50Not in the top three

Azure SQL Database2 of 50Not in the top three

Backblaze B22 of 50Not in the top three

DigitalOcean Managed Databases2 of 50Not in the top three

DigitalOcean Spaces2 of 50Not in the top three

Google Cloud Storage2 of 50Not in the top three

Hetzner2 of 50Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Scaleway. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 5 answers that named Scaleway and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

digitalocean.com3

worldmetrics.org3

cloudexpat.com2

g2.com2

gartner.com2

github.com2

mixpeek.com2

aimultiple.com1

algoroq.io1

atlantic.net1

Nineteen of the nineteen domain citations in answers naming Scaleway came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

digitalocean.com/resources/articles/object-storage-solutions-cloud-data2

gartner.com/reviews/market/file-and-object-storage-platforms2

github.com/mixpeek/awesome-object-storage2

mixpeek.com/blog/object-storage-comparison-20262

worldmetrics.org/service/object-storage2

aimultiple.com/cloud-object-storage1

algoroq.io/compare-tech/rds-vs-cloud-sql-vs-azure-sql1

atlantic.net/vps-hosting/how-to-find-the-top-cloud-hosting-providers1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Scaleway's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Scaleway, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at scaleway.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.