IT AI Index

Index › Products › SAP BTP · October 2026 Edition

SAP · 1 category · Named, not ranked

SAP BTP

3Judge labels

0First choices

2Negative labels

2 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

1 label, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. SAP BTP was named 1 time in API management, where Kong Gateway led with 37%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market53 of 61

under the label threshold

Enterprise62 of 75

under the label threshold

In api management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named SAP BTP for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
API management	Developer platform	0%	53 of 61	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Kong Gateway at 37%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for SAP BTP yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated SAP BTP across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative3 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“"occupy the intermediate tier, balancing solid security features with trade-offs in depth, ease of use, or ecosystem alignment."” Muse Glimmer 30B · API management · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as SAP BTP, over the 3 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SAP BTP was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform3 of 30Not among the top eight

Amazon API Gateway2 of 30Not among the top eight

Apigee2 of 30Not among the top eight

Axway Amplify API Management2 of 30Not among the top eight

Azure API Management2 of 30Not among the top eight

Boomi2 of 30Not among the top eight

Gravitee2 of 30Not among the top eight

IBM API Connect2 of 30Not among the top eight

Kong Gateway2 of 30Not among the top eight

Oracle API Management2 of 30Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SAP BTP. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 3 answers that named SAP BTP and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com3

actionable-agents-guide.cio.com2

blog.axway.com2

gravitee.io2

ijcaonline.org2

integrate.io2

linkedin.com2

zuplo.com2

apiboost.com1

aws.amazon.com1

Nineteen of the nineteen domain citations in answers naming SAP BTP came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

actionable-agents-guide.cio.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/132/2025/07/MuleSoft-Gartner-API-2

ijcaonline.org/archives/volume187/number54/venkiteela-2025-ijca-925924.pdf2

integrate.io/blog/api-management-tools2

apiboost.com/1

apiboost.com/faq1

aws.amazon.com/api-gateway/faqs1

aws.amazon.com/blogs/compute/building-responsive-apis-with-amazon-api-gateway-response-str1

aws.amazon.com/documentation-overview/api-gateway1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Follow SAP BTP

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

SAP is the company behind SAP BTP.

ShowHide

On record

Company records

Also from SAP: SAP AI, SAP Access Control, SAP Ariba, SAP BTP API Management, SAP Build Process Automation, SAP Business ByDesign, SAP Business Data Cloud, SAP Business One and 19 more

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Create and consume in-memory cache with Redis based on hyperscalers
sap.com/products/technology-platform/redis-on-sap-btp-hyperscaler-option.html
For: external
sap.com/products/technology-platform/redis-on-sap-btp-hyperscaler-option.html
Price stated: Pay-As-You-Go for SAP BTP for Cloud test, demo, and development sap.com/products/technology-platform/redis-on-sap-btp-hyperscaler-option.html
Free plan or trial: Cloud test, demo, and development sap.com/products/technology-platform/redis-on-sap-btp-hyperscaler-option.html
Certifications: SAP CertifiedISO 27001ISO 12207
Not stated on the pages read: Starting price, integrations, hosting, customers

What SAP BTP's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: sap.com/products/technology-platform/redis-on-sap-btp-hyperscaler-option.html, sap.com/products/technology-platform/alert-notification-service-for-sap-btp.html, sap.com/products/technology-platform/postgresql-on-sap-btp-hyperscaler-option.html, sap.com/products/scm/partners/mtm-solutions-gmbh-ticon-for-sap-btp-solution-for-mtm.html, sap.com/products/technology-platform/partners/sierra-digital-inc-sierra-genxbridge-for-sap-btp.html. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SAP BTP's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SAP BTP, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for SAP BTP by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where SAP BTP is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name SAP BTP, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.