Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 46 → 50 of 58
3 categories · RankedRiskWatch
18Judge labels
0First choices
3Negative labels
9 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in GRC for mid-market buyers
Rank 18 of 75 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 7 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business52 of 60
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market18 of 75
0%7 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise37 of 67
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
In grc · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named RiskWatch for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRC platforms | Security operations | 0% | 18 of 75 | 0% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by Hyperproof at 19% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Vulnerability management platforms | Security operations | 0% | 28 of 77 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Rapid7 InsightVM at 30% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Compliance automation | Security operations | 0% | 53 of 67 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Drata at 34% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, RiskWatch held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · GRC · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 21 → 16 of 69
EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 35 of 65, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRC | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 21 → 18 of 75 |
| Vuln management | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 28 of 77, unchanged |
| Compliance automation | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 53 of 67, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated RiskWatch across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated RiskWatch across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase3 labelsNone
Comparative3 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained4 labelsNone
Negative4 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative18 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“For highly regulated industries or those needing extensive framework coverage, RiskWatch or StandardFusion may be more suitable.” Mistral Small · GRC · direct prompt · alternative
“For those needing a more specialized or consolidated risk and compliance register, RiskWatch is also highly recommended.” Mistral Small · GRC · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“offers broad GRC capabilities and may suit companies with diverse risk management needs” MiniMax M2.5 · GRC · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“RiskWatch — deeper GRC with 40+ frameworks and cross-mapping, mid-market focus” DeepSeek V4 Flash · GRC · scale prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as RiskWatch, over the 18 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and RiskWatch was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as RiskWatch, over the 18 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and RiskWatch was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named RiskWatch. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 17 of the 18 answers that named RiskWatch and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
riskwatch.comYour site17
zengrc.com10
vanta.com7
orbiqhq.com6
apono.io5
expertinsights.com5
surecloud.com5
apptega.com4
complyjet.com4
springfuse.com4
Fifty of the sixty-seven domain citations in answers naming RiskWatch came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
riskwatch.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, RiskWatch takes 0% of first choices and Hyperproof takes 19%.ShowHide
Search and answers
riskwatch.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, RiskWatch takes 0% of first choices and Hyperproof takes 19%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “grc platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “grc platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 170 a month (“riskwatch”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 1,254 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 1,503 · 20 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 875
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 18 of 75 in GRC
Segment leader
19%
Hyperproof
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 18 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 17 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on riskwatch.com
555
subdomains included
Content
381
counted in the table below
Documentation
68
Product · Integration
1 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 297 | 0 | 2026-06-09 | GRC, Email security | |
| Template or tool | 29 | 0 | 2026-05-10 | ||
| Comparison | 25 | 1 | 2026-07-19 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 21 | 0 | 2026-06-11 | GRC | |
| Case study | 6 | 0 | 2026-05-14 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 3 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-07-19Qualitative vs quantitative risk assessment comparison
- 2026-06-11Circadian risk alternatives comparison
- 2026-06-11Easyset alternatives comparison
- 2026-06-11RiskWatch vs Archer & MetricStream (2026) comparison
- 2026-06-11Riskwatch vs diligent actimize comparison
- 2026-06-11RiskWatch vs Drata: Honest Comparison (2026) comparison
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page riskwatch.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow RiskWatch
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
RiskWatch is its own company.ShowHide
The company
RiskWatch is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- GRC software for mid-market and enterprise teams.
- For
- mid-market and enterprise teams
- Price stated
- $99 per month, no per-framework upcharge riskwatch.com
- Starting price
- $99 per month riskwatch.com
- Free plan or trial
- 7-day free trial riskwatch.com
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type IIISO/IEC 27001:2022HIPAA-alignedGDPR-aligned
- Hosting
- US East (us-east-1, N. Virginia)EU Frankfurt (eu-central-1)
- Customers named
- AonBoseCoca-ColaIberdrolaJ&JPfizerPumaSeaWorld
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations
What RiskWatch's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: riskwatch.com, riskwatch.com/security, riskwatch.com/solutions, riskwatch.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when RiskWatch's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as RiskWatch, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for RiskWatch by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where RiskWatch is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name RiskWatch, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.