AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Quest On Demand · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Quest On Demand

12Judge labels
0First choices
1Negative labels
6 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Quest On Demand was named 3 times in M365 management, where CoreView led with 20%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In m365 management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Quest On Demand for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Microsoft 365 managementIT operations and endpoint0%36 of 1490%3under 10 labels · led by CoreView at 20%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Quest On Demand yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Quest On Demand across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast01001
Mistral Small00101
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500101
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained7 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative12 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Quest (migrations/identity)” Grok 4.1 Fast · M365 management · scale prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Quest On Demand, over the 12 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Quest On Demand was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
CoreView11 of 124Not among the top eight
AvePoint Confidence Platform8 of 120Not among the top eight
Microsoft 365 Admin Center5 of 122Not among the top eight
ShareGate5 of 120Not among the top eight
Syskit Point3 of 121Not among the top eight
ManageEngine M365 Manager Plus3 of 120Not among the top eight
Microsoft Entra ID3 of 120Not among the top eight
Microsoft Intune3 of 120Not among the top eight
Microsoft Purview3 of 120Not among the top eight
Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 3653 of 120Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Quest On Demand. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 8 of the 12 answers that named Quest On Demand and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com6
microsoft.com5
expertinsights.com4
coreview.com3
learn.microsoft.com3
sourceforge.net3
support.quest.comYour site3
zluri.com3
cloudfuze.com2
itechguides.com2

Thirty-one of the thirty-four domain citations in answers naming Quest On Demand came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

quest.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Quest On Demand takes 0% of first choices and CoreView takes 20%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “microsoft 365 management tool”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “microsoft 365 management tools”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
590 a month (“quest on demand”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
29 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 270,376 a month
Searches its site ranks for
15,329 · 768 in the top three
Sites linking to it
11,331
Paid Google search
2 searches its ads show for, about 4 clicks and $0 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
120+ ads · 70 image, 50 text · 52 shown in the last 30 days

First shown October 2025, as Quest Software, Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 96 in the year, 24 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 36 of 149 in M365 management
Segment leader
20%
CoreView
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
12 answers
Its own site cited
in 8 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on quest.com
4,843
subdomains included
Content
1,774
counted in the table below
Documentation
41
Product · Integration
129 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog883252026-09-17Patching, UEM
Webinar or virtual event28902025-06-11UEM, Backup and DR
Podcast or video243undatedUEM
Report or ebook223undatedUEM, Backup and DR
Glossary or explainer5602021-06-23Object storage, MFA
Conference or event3802025-07-07
Comparison2512026-09-15
Case study812026-07-23
Template or tool8undated
News or press1undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page quest.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name UEM (19); 0 name the category the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Quest On Demand

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Quest On Demand; a claim can dispute any of them.
Quest 2

Follow Quest On Demand

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Quest On Demand is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Free plan or trial
Free Trials quest.com
Customers named
Tiger AnalyticsTokio Marine HCC InternationalSandhill Consultants
Not stated on the pages read
Positioning, who it is for, price, starting price, integrations, certifications, hosting

What Quest On Demand's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: quest.com, trust.quest.com, quest.com/platform, quest.com/customer-stories. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Quest On Demand's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Quest On Demand, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Quest On Demand by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Quest On Demand is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Quest On Demand, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at quest.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.