Index › Products › Power Automate Process Mining · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Power Automate Process Mining

4Judge labels

0First choices

1Negative labels

3 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Power Automate Process Mining was named 3 times in Process mining, where Apromore led with 19%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market41 of 61

under the label threshold

Enterprise31 of 50

under the label threshold

In process mining · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Power Automate Process Mining for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Process mining	IT operations and endpoint	0%	41 of 61	33%	3	under 10 labels · led by Apromore at 19%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Power Automate Process Mining yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Power Automate Process Mining across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	1	1	2
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative4 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Microsoft 365/Power Platform shop → Power Automate Process Mining (very affordable, ~$5–15/user/month)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Process mining · scale prompt · alternative

“start with Power Automate if you're already Microsoft-heavy and want a narrower, lower-friction trial” GPT-6 Luna · Process mining · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Power Automate Process Mining, if you need a standalone platform or have complex data needs... check the fit and total cost if you don’t” GPT-6 Luna · Process mining · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Power Automate Process Mining, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Power Automate Process Mining was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Celonis Process Intelligence Platform3 of 41Not among the top eight

SAP Signavio Process Intelligence3 of 40Not among the top eight

UiPath Process Mining3 of 40Not among the top eight

Apromore2 of 41Not among the top eight

Automation Anywhere1 of 40Not among the top eight

IBM Process Mining1 of 40Not among the top eight

Mindzie1 of 40Not among the top eight

PM4Py1 of 40Not among the top eight

ProcessMind1 of 40Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Power Automate Process Mining. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 4 answers that named Power Automate Process Mining and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

gartner.com2

learn.microsoft.com2

signavio.com2

apromore.com1

arxiv.org1

assets.ctfassets.net1

beefed.ai1

ciopages.com1

dupple.com1

erpresearch.com1

No domain is on file for Power Automate Process Mining, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

learn.microsoft.com/en-us/power-automate/process-advisor-overview2

apromore.com/1

arxiv.org/abs/1905.061691

assets.ctfassets.net/zmrtlfup12q3/3cxGx6cy7zhvUdLC1DjwVh/92d132756e72eb83f549f7bc49b9d025/1

assets.ctfassets.net/zmrtlfup12q3/KMk3kl5bVZ6gO7uiC9v7Q/e1b38b1937afa9255b6e404e283a68c0/21

beefed.ai/en/process-mining-tools-celonis-signavio-uipath1

ciopages.com/buyer-guides/process-mining1

dupple.com/learn/best-ai-process-mining-tools1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Follow Power Automate Process Mining

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Power Automate Process Mining's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Power Automate Process Mining, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Power Automate Process Mining by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Power Automate Process Mining is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Power Automate Process Mining, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.