IT AI Index

Index › Products › Permiso · October 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

Permiso

9Judge labels

0First choices

1Negative labels

7 / 14Models named it

2Categories

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

4 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Permiso was named 4 times in ITDR and 1 other category, where Huntress Managed ITDR led with 51%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market35 of 105

under the label threshold

Enterprise31 of 91

under the label threshold

In itdr · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Permiso for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Identity threat detection and response	Identity and access	0%	35 of 105	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Huntress Managed ITDR at 51%
Non-human identity management	Identity and access	0%	119 of 128	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by JumpCloud at 14%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Permiso yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Permiso across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative3 labelsNone

Budget-constrained2 labelsNone

Scale-constrained3 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative9 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Permiso is a strong pick if your identity environment spans multiple cloud providers” Claude Haiku 4.5 · ITDR · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Dedicated NHI capabilities are relatively new to Okta (via the Permiso acquisition), so maturity is unproven.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · NHI management · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Permiso, over the 9 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Permiso was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Huntress Managed ITDR5 of 90Not among the top eight

CrowdStrike Falcon Identity Protection4 of 92Not among the top eight

Silverfort ITDR4 of 90Not among the top eight

Microsoft Defender for Identity3 of 91Not among the top eight

BeyondTrust3 of 90Not among the top eight

Delinea3 of 90Not among the top eight

Semperis Directory Services Protector3 of 90Not among the top eight

CyberArk Identity Security Platform2 of 91Not among the top eight

CrowdStrike2 of 90Not among the top eight

Cynet2 of 90Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Permiso. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 9 of the 9 answers that named Permiso and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

expertinsights.com5

permiso.ioYour site5

cybersecuritynews.com4

breachsense.com3

cynet.com3

exaforce.com3

expel.com3

huntress.com3

microsoft.com3

peerspot.com3

Thirty of the thirty-five domain citations in answers naming Permiso came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

cybersecuritynews.com/best-identity-threat-detection-and-response-solutions4

expertinsights.com/identity-and-access-management/the-top-identity-threat-detection-and-re4

breachsense.com/blog/itdr-tools3

cynet.com/security-foundations/identity-security/itdr-vendors3

expel.com/cyberspeak/how-to-evaluate-itdr-vendors3

huntress.com/itdr-guide/best-itdr-vendors3

permiso.io/resources/itdr-buyers-guide-20263

reco.ai/compare/top-itdr-tools3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on permiso.io

181

subdomains included

Content

145

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

1 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	135	2	2026-07-09	ITDR, SIEM
Webinar or virtual event	4	undated
Report or ebook	3	undated
Comparison	2	undated		SIEM, ITDR
Case study	1	undated

Most recent

2026-07-09Introducing the risk score engine blog
2026-07-09Why identity security needs risk scoring blog
2026-06-16Gcp servicedata officially deprecated actively dangerous blog
2026-06-11Best itdr platform hacker news cybersecurity stars 2026 blog
2026-05-29Chatgpt markdown rendering vulnerability blog
2026-05-14Why we built identity runtime attribution for ai agents blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page permiso.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Permiso

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Permiso is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: The Permiso Platform discovers, protects, and defends human, non-human and AI identities in cloud and on-prem environments.
permiso.io
For: security teams
permiso.io
Customers named: Modern HealthNetflixACV AuctionsAutodesk
Not stated on the pages read: Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting

What Permiso's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: permiso.io, permiso.io/security, permiso.io/product, permiso.io/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Permiso's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Permiso, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Permiso by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Permiso is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Permiso, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.