AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Oracle NoSQL Database · October 2026 Edition
Oracle · 1 category · Ranked

Oracle NoSQL Database

13Judge labels
1First choices
2Negative labels
7 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in NoSQL for enterprise buyers
Rank 52 of 73 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 100% of its 1 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In nosql · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Oracle NoSQL Database for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
NoSQL databasesData platform0%52 of 73100%1under 10 labels · led by MongoDB at 74%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Oracle NoSQL Database held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · NoSQL · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 41 → 55 of 59
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 62 → 49 of 69
Enterprise▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 4 → 7 of 53

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
NoSQL0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 62 → 52 of 73

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Oracle NoSQL Database across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.2000000
Mistral Small00011
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative4 labelsNone
Budget-constrained5 labels1
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative13 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“may be more complex and costly than traditional SQL databases” Mistral Small · NoSQL · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Oracle NoSQL Database, over the 13 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Oracle NoSQL Database was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
MongoDB12 of 132Not among the top eight
Amazon DynamoDB11 of 130Not among the top eight
Couchbase9 of 131Not among the top eight
Azure Cosmos DB8 of 132Not among the top eight
Apache Cassandra8 of 130Not among the top eight
Redis6 of 130Not among the top eight
ScyllaDB5 of 130Not among the top eight
Google Cloud Bigtable4 of 130Not among the top eight
Aerospike3 of 131Not among the top eight
PostgreSQL2 of 131Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Oracle NoSQL Database. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 11 of the 13 answers that named Oracle NoSQL Database and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

guideflow.com8
aerospike.com5
oracle.comYour site5
thectoclub.com5
us.fitgap.com5
windowsforum.com5
cio.economictimes.indiatimes.com4
it-ai-index.com4
peerspot.com4
1bench.dev3

Forty-three of the forty-eight domain citations in answers naming Oracle NoSQL Database came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where Oracle NoSQL Database stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Searches for its name, Google
70 a month (“oracle nosql database”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
12 a month
Its own site
It sits on Oracle's site (oracle.com), so there are no site figures for it alone

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 52 of 73 in nosql
Segment leader
74%
MongoDB
First choices
1 across its categories
Named in
13 answers
Its own site cited
in 11 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Follow Oracle NoSQL Database

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Oracle is the company behind Oracle NoSQL Database.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Oracle NoSQL Database can be run in the cloud or on-premises for applications that require either flexible data models, workloads, demanding predictable, lighting fast access to data or easy to use APIs.
Price stated
low pay-per-use pricing oracle.com/ae/database/nosql
Free plan or trial
Try Oracle Cloud Free Tier oracle.com/ae/database/nosql
Certifications
ACID transactions
Hosting
cloud or on-premisesactive-active regional replicationbetween geographically separated regionstwo different regions
Customers named
Turkish Notary UnionNTT DocomoAirbus
Not stated on the pages read
Starting price, integrations

What Oracle NoSQL Database's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: oracle.com/ae/database/nosql, oracle.com/apac/database/nosql, oracle.com/asean/database/nosql, oracle.com/latam/database/nosql, oracle.com/africa/database/nosql. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Oracle NoSQL Database's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Oracle NoSQL Database, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Oracle NoSQL Database by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Oracle NoSQL Database is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Oracle NoSQL Database, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at oracle.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.