Small business▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 5 → 10 of 59
4 categories · RankedRedis
169Judge labels
2First choices
35Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
4Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in NoSQL for mid-market buyers
Rank 4 of 73 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 15% of its 55 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Redis →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business10 of 60
0%51 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market4 of 73
2%55 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise8 of 54
2%41 labels
criticized challenger
In nosql · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Redis for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NoSQL databases | Data platform | 2% | 4 of 73 | 15% | 55 | accepted challenger | ▼−3Since September 2026: 6% → 2%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Vector databases | Data platform | 0% | 12 of 44 | 0% | 10 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Managed relational databases | Data platform | 0% | 80 of 82 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Amazon RDS at 45% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Streaming platforms | Data platform | 0% | 85 of 98 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Confluent Cloud at 39% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Redis held within the floor in all four categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · NoSQL · by segment
Mid-market▼−3Since September 2026: 6% → 2%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 6% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 4 of 69, unchanged
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 7 → 8 of 53
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NoSQL | 6% | 2% | ▼−3Since September 2026: 6% → 2%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 4 of 73, unchanged |
| Vector databases | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 17 → 12 of 44 |
| Managed databases | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 80 of 82, unchanged |
| Streaming | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 85 of 98, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Redis across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Redis across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 9 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 7 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 6 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 7 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct18 labelsNone
Paraphrase24 labels2
Comparative45 labels4not counted in share
Budget-constrained17 labelsNone
Scale-constrained26 labelsNone
Negative39 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative169 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 6 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Redis is the most popular and versatile key-value store... ideal for mid-sized B2B applications” Mistral Small · NoSQL · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Redis receiving the highest rating of 8.9 among the leaders” Claude Haiku 4.5 · NoSQL · comparative prompt · first choice
“Key-Value Stores Top Examples: Redis, Amazon DynamoDB” Qwen 3.7 Flash · NoSQL · comparative prompt · first choice
“Redis dominating performance-critical use cases” Kimi K2 · NoSQL · comparative prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Redis changed to RSALv2+SSPL licensing in 2024 - The shift to more restrictive licenses affects commercial use and portability” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Managed databases · negative prompt · hard negative
“Redis is extremely fast but should be used with caution for data that needs to persist on disk or for applications requiring complex queries” Mistral Small · NoSQL · negative prompt · soft negative
“Cautious when: Using it as a primary database rather than a cache — it's an in-memory store, and data durability can be a concern.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · NoSQL · negative prompt · soft negative
“early versions lacked auth. Redis 7+ is solid; use ACLs and avoid as a primary durable store unless clustered with persistence.” Grok 4.20 · NoSQL · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Redis, over the 166 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Redis was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Redis, over the 166 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Redis was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Redis. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 137 of the 166 answers that named Redis and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
mongodb.com43
thectoclub.com42
guideflow.com41
g2.com36
aerospike.com33
redis.ioYour site32
peerspot.com30
pingcap.com30
couchbase.com29
dnsstuff.com29
313 of the 345 domain citations in answers naming Redis came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
redis.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Redis takes 2% of first choices and MongoDB takes 74%.ShowHide
Search and answers
redis.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Redis takes 2% of first choices and MongoDB takes 74%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “nosql database”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “nosql databases”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 27,100 a month (“redis”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 6,980 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 112,424 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 20,385 · 1,666 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 31,239
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 4 of 73 in nosql
Segment leader
74%
MongoDB
- First choices
- 2 across its categories
- Named in
- 166 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 137 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on redis.io
8,468
subdomains included
Content
1,863
counted in the table below
Documentation
5,666
Product · Integration
38 · 17
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 1,114 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 156 | undated | |||
| News or press | 148 | undated | Cloud hosting | ||
| Podcast or video | 135 | 1 | 2026-09-25 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 82 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 80 | 1 | 2026-07-20 | ||
| Comparison | 68 | undated | |||
| Case study | 58 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 13 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 9 | undated |
Most recent
Events in person
Upcoming
- November 30, 2026Redis Welcome Party at AWS re:Invent 2026Cañonita at The Venetian Shoppes, Las Vegas · hosts
- December 3, 2026Agent Arena at AWS re:Invent 2026Juliet Lounge, The Venetian Casino Floor, Las Vegas, US · takes part
Last twelve months
- July 7, 2026 to July 8, 2026World AI Show Indonesia 2026Sheraton Grand Jakarta Gandaria City Hotel, Kota Jakarta Selatan, Indonesia · sponsored
- June 9, 2026SmartDay 2026Vaudoise Arena, Lausanne · hosted
- April 1, 2026AWS Summit Paris 2026Palais des Congres de Paris, Porte Maillot · took part
As the event pages on redis.io state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page redis.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Redis
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Redis; a claim can dispute any of them.
Redis (RediSearch) 2Redis Cloud 2Redis (or Valkey fork) 1Redis (via Redis Enterprise or AWS ElastiCache) 1Redis Enterprise 1
Follow Redis
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Redis is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Redis is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Real-time data for agents & apps
- For
- Developers
- Price stated
- Let’s talk numbers redis.io
- Starting price
- 0 redis.io/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Try Redis redis.io
- Certifications
- CCPACSA STARGDPRHIPAAISO 22301ISO 9001:2015ISO/IEC 27001ISO/IEC 27017:2015
- Hosting
- AWSAzureGCP
- Customers named
- Ulta BeautySuperlinkedSonylivPlivoNianticJetBlueBritish AirwaysMercedes-Benz
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations
What Redis's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: redis.io, redis.io/pricing, trust.redis.io, redis.io/solutions, redis.io/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Redis's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Redis, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Redis by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Redis is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Redis, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.