IT AI Index

Index › Vendors › Google Cloud Bigtable · September 2026 Edition

Google Cloud · 2 categories · Named, not ranked

Google Cloud Bigtable

10Judge labels

1First choices

0Negative labels

7 of 12Models named it

2Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

5 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Google Cloud Bigtable was named 5 times in NoSQL and 1 other category, where MongoDB led with 59%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business17 of 47

under the label threshold

Mid-market22 of 72

under the label threshold

Enterprise9 of 48

under the label threshold

In nosql · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Google Cloud Bigtable for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
NoSQL databases	Data platform	0%	22 of 72	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by MongoDB at 59%
Managed relational databases	Data platform	0%	50 of 73	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Amazon RDS at 32%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Google Cloud Bigtable yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Google Cloud Bigtable across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	2	2
Kimi K2	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative3 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 label1

Scale-constrained3 labelsNone

Negative3 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative10 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Google Cloud Bigtable, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Google Cloud Bigtable was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

MongoDB8 of 104Not in the top three

Redis8 of 101Not in the top three

Amazon DynamoDB8 of 100Not in the top three

Apache Cassandra7 of 101Not in the top three

Neo4j6 of 101Not in the top three

Azure Cosmos DB6 of 100Not in the top three

Couchbase6 of 100Not in the top three

ScyllaDB6 of 100Not in the top three

Apache HBase5 of 100Not in the top three

Amazon DocumentDB3 of 100Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Google Cloud Bigtable. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 10 answers that named Google Cloud Bigtable and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

aerospike.com2

azure.microsoft.com2

cloud.google.com2

guideflow.com2

infoworld.com2

instaclustr.com2

medium.com2

pingcap.com2

scylladb.com2

1bench.dev1

Nineteen of the nineteen domain citations in answers naming Google Cloud Bigtable came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

aerospike.com/blog/ten-best-nosql-cloud-databases2

guideflow.com/blog/nosql-database-software2

pingcap.com/article/top-10-nosql-databases-to-consider-20242

dista.uninsubria.it/~alessandra.rizzardi/public/documents/2022_nosql.pdf1

getlist.cc/index-340.html1

pages.aerospike.com/rs/229-XUE-318/images/Aerospike_Whitepaper__5-Signs-Outgrown-Cassandra1

1bench.dev/databases/nosql1

admin-magazine.com/index.php/layout/set/print/Archive/2024/84/When-you-should-and-should-n1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Google Cloud Bigtable

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Google Cloud Bigtable; a claim can dispute any of them.

Cloud Bigtable 2Google Bigtable 2Bigtable 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Google Cloud Bigtable's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Google Cloud Bigtable, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at google.dev is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.