IT AI Index
Index Vendors › Aerospike · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Aerospike

23Judge labels
0First choices
2Negative labels
10 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in NoSQL for enterprise buyers
Rank 17 of 72 in the mid-market standing
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 14% of its 7 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In nosql · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Aerospike for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
NoSQL databasesData platform0%17 of 7214%7under 10 labels · led by MongoDB at 59%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Aerospike yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Aerospike across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00101
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00011
Llama 4 Maverick01102
Qwen 3.7 Flash00101
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX01001
MiniMax M2.500101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase5 labelsNone
Comparative6 labelsNone
Budget-constrained7 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative23 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Aerospike Cloud - a key-value, document/JSON database with distributed ACID and high-throughput real-time OLTP at petabyte scale.” Llama 4 Maverick · NoSQL · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“If you need strong consistency and cost-effective large-scale storage, consider Aerospike.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · NoSQL · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“only relevant at serious scale ... likely overkill for a typical mid-sized B2B company” DeepSeek V4 Flash · NoSQL · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Aerospike, over the 23 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Aerospike was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Amazon DynamoDB20 of 234Not in the top three
MongoDB19 of 2310Not in the top three
Couchbase16 of 232Not in the top three
Redis15 of 231Not in the top three
Azure Cosmos DB12 of 230Not in the top three
Apache Cassandra11 of 231Not in the top three
ScyllaDB7 of 231Not in the top three
Neo4j6 of 230Not in the top three
DataStax Astra DB5 of 230Not in the top three
Oracle NoSQL Database4 of 231Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Aerospike. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 20 of the 23 answers that named Aerospike and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

aerospike.comYour site20
couchbase.com10
sourceforge.net9
db-engines.com8
infoworld.com8
mongodb.com8
windowsforum.com8
cio.economictimes.indiatimes.com7
scylladb.com7
pingcap.com6

Seventy-one of the ninety-one domain citations in answers naming Aerospike came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Aerospike

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Aerospike; a claim can dispute any of them.
Aerospike Cloud 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Aerospike's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Aerospike, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at aerospike.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack