IT AI Index
Index Vendors › Oracle Cloud Infrastructure Object Storage · September 2026 Edition
Oracle · 1 category · Named, not ranked

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure Object Storage

16Judge labels
1First choices
2Negative labels
9 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
6 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Oracle Cloud Infrastructure Object Storage was named 6 times in Object storage, where Backblaze B2 led with 46%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In object storage · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Oracle Cloud Infrastructure Object Storage for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Object storageCloud and infrastructure0%16 of 4617%6under 10 labels · led by Backblaze B2 at 46%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Oracle Cloud Infrastructure Object Storage yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Oracle Cloud Infrastructure Object Storage across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00011
Grok 4.1 Fast00202
Mistral Small01001
DeepSeek V4 Flash00101
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00101
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase2 labels1
Comparative8 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative16 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“High durability, performance, and competitive pricing, often preferred for large-scale enterprise use” Mistral Small · Object storage · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“be cautious if you care about low-cost storage or simple pricing, because the directory lists it among higher-cost options” Perplexity Sonar · Object storage · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Oracle Cloud Infrastructure Object Storage, over the 16 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Oracle Cloud Infrastructure Object Storage was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Amazon S315 of 169Not in the top three
Google Cloud Storage14 of 161Not in the top three
Cloudflare R212 of 162Not in the top three
Azure Blob Storage12 of 161Not in the top three
Backblaze B212 of 160Not in the top three
Wasabi11 of 161Not in the top three
IBM Cloud Object Storage10 of 160Not in the top three
DigitalOcean Spaces7 of 160Not in the top three
MinIO7 of 160Not in the top three
NetApp StorageGRID4 of 161Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Oracle Cloud Infrastructure Object Storage. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 15 of the 16 answers that named Oracle Cloud Infrastructure Object Storage and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

worldmetrics.org13
aimultiple.com8
gartner.com8
mixpeek.com8
digitalocean.com7
enterprisestorageforum.com7
solutionsreview.com6
solved.scality.com6
backblaze.com5
cloudexpat.com5

Seventy-three of the seventy-three domain citations in answers naming Oracle Cloud Infrastructure Object Storage came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Oracle Cloud Infrastructure Object Storage

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Oracle Cloud Infrastructure Object Storage; a claim can dispute any of them.
Oracle Cloud 2Oracle 1Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Object Storage 1Oracle Cloud Object Storage 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Oracle Cloud Infrastructure Object Storage's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Oracle Cloud Infrastructure Object Storage, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at oracle.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack