| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data warehouses | Data platform | 49% | 1 of 26 | 22% | 78 | endorsed leader | ▲+1Since September 2026: 47% → 48%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Data masking and test data management | Data platform | 0% | 137 of 140 | 50% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by DATPROF at 17% | |
| ETL and ELT | Data platform | 0% | 20 of 75 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Fivetran at 40% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Data catalogs and governance | Data platform | 0% | 60 of 83 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Atlan at 44% | |
| Data virtualization | Data platform | 0% | 44 of 99 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Denodo at 28% | |
| Enterprise storage systems | Cloud and infrastructure | 0% | 160 of 167 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Dell PowerStore at 16% | |
| Telemetry pipelines | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 73 of 124 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by OpenTelemetry Collector at 37% | |
| Time series databases | Data platform | 0% | 31 of 66 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by TimescaleDB at 63% |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data warehouses | 47% | 48% | ▲+1Since September 2026: 47% → 48%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 1 of 26, unchanged |
| Data masking | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 137 of 140, unchanged |
| ETL | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 21 → 20 of 75 |
| Data catalogs | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 60 of 83, unchanged |
| Data virtualization | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 44 of 99, unchanged |
| Enterprise storage | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 160 of 167, unchanged |
| Telemetry pipelines | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 73 of 124, unchanged |
| Time series DBs | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 31 of 66, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 8 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 3 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 9 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| Grok 4.20 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6 |
| Mistral Small | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 2 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 7 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 9 |
| Kimi K2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 6 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 6 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 8 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 6 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“For a typical mid-sized B2B company, I'd recommend Snowflake because: 1. It provides the best balance of features, scalability, and flexibility” MiniMax M2.5 · Data warehouses · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“If your team wants a platform that "just works" with almost zero database administration (DBA) overhead, Snowflake is the top recommendation.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Data warehouses · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“"Snowflake offers balance. Stable, reliable, and scalable, and with smart engine sizing and auto-suspend, it can be cost-effective too."” Muse Glimmer 30B · Data warehouses · comparative prompt · first choice
“For many mid-market B2B companies, Snowflake is a popular choice due to its balance of ease of use, scalability, and flexibility.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Data warehouses · direct prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“A securities lawsuit was filed against Snowflake alleging the company failed to disclose shortcomings in customer data security arrangements that allowed data breaches.” MiniMax M2.5 · Enterprise storage · negative prompt · hard negative
“What to Avoid on a Tight Budget - Snowflake: ... It's typically the most expensive option.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Data warehouses · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid Snowflake on a tight budget.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Data warehouses · budget prompt · hard negative
“Many major database engines (e.g., SQL Server, Oracle, Snowflake) offer native, built-in Dynamic Data Masking (DDM) out of the box. While convenient, relying on these as your primary defense is highly risky.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Data masking · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 228 of the 265 answers that named Snowflake and are not a share of its labels.
728 of the 728 domain citations in answers naming Snowflake came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 1,589 | 7 | 2026-09-28 | ||
| Report or ebook | 900 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 633 | 1 | 2026-09-11 | ||
| Case study | 386 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 315 | undated | |||
| News or press | 242 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 139 | 9 | 2026-10-27 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 131 | 0 | 2026-04-02 | ||
| Comparison | 18 | 1 | 2026-09-03 | ||
| Template or tool | 5 | 0 | 2025-12-09 |
As the event pages on snowflake.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
Every page snowflake.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Snowflake's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: snowflake.com, snowflake.com/pricing, trust.snowflake.com, snowflake.com/en/product, snowflake.com/en/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Snowflake's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Snowflake, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Snowflake by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
AI models recommend Snowflake first in Data warehouses this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.