IT AI Index

Index › Vendors › Teradata Vantage · September 2026 Edition

Teradata · 1 category · Named, not ranked

Teradata Vantage

10Judge labels

0First choices

7Negative labels

6 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

4 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Teradata Vantage was named 4 times in Data warehouses, where Snowflake led with 47%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business43 of 43

under the label threshold

Mid-market41 of 41

under the label threshold

Enterprise34 of 34

under the label threshold

In data warehouses · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Teradata Vantage for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Data warehouses	Data platform	0%	41 of 41	75%	4	under 10 labels · led by Snowflake at 47%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Teradata Vantage yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Teradata Vantage across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative3 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative7 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative10 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid: Legacy Enterprise "Lift-and-Shift" Warehouses (Teradata Vantage Cloud, Oracle Exadata Cloud Service)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Data warehouses · negative prompt · hard negative

“Legacy "Hosted" Warehouses (Avoid)... Why to avoid them: They generally lack true cloud-native elasticity.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Data warehouses · negative prompt · hard negative

“Avoid "lifting and shifting" old on-premises data warehouse architectures (like traditional Teradata or Oracle) to the cloud” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Data warehouses · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Teradata Vantage, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Teradata Vantage was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Snowflake10 of 102Not in the top three

Google BigQuery10 of 101Not in the top three

Amazon Redshift10 of 100Not in the top three

ClickHouse Cloud8 of 100Not in the top three

Databricks7 of 100Not in the top three

Microsoft Fabric7 of 100Not in the top three

Azure Synapse Analytics5 of 100Not in the top three

Oracle Autonomous Data Warehouse3 of 100Not in the top three

Oracle Exadata3 of 100Not in the top three

Apache Druid2 of 100Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Teradata Vantage. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 10 answers that named Teradata Vantage and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

clickhouse.com6

atlan.com4

dev.to3

docs.aws.amazon.com3

materialize.com3

aws.amazon.com2

blog.quest.com2

brickclay.com2

checkthat.ai2

domo.com2

Twenty-nine of the twenty-nine domain citations in answers naming Teradata Vantage came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

atlan.com/best-cloud-data-warehouses4

clickhouse.com/resources/engineering/top-5-cloud-data-warehouses4

clickhouse.com/blog/cloud-data-warehouses-cost-performance-comparison3

dev.to/engineersguide/snowflake-vs-databricks-bigquery-vs-redshift-2026-guide-hni3

materialize.com/blog/warehouse-abuse3

blog.quest.com/cloud-data-warehouse-navigating-the-risks-and-challenges-of-adoption2

brickclay.com/cloud-data-warehouses-for-enterprise-amazon-vs-azure-vs-google-vs-snowflake2

checkthat.ai/answers/what-are-the-best-cloud-computing-data-warehouse-solutions2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Teradata Vantage

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Teradata Vantage; a claim can dispute any of them.

Teradata 1Teradata Vantage Cloud 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Teradata Vantage's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Teradata Vantage, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at teradata.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.