IT AI Index

Index › Products › Openlayer · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Openlayer

3Judge labels

0First choices

1Negative labels

3 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Openlayer was named 3 times in AI governance, where Credo AI led with 18%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market98 of 135

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In ai governance · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Openlayer for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
AI governance platforms	Data platform	0%	98 of 135	33%	3	under 10 labels · led by Credo AI at 18%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Openlayer yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Openlayer across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative3 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best for Engineering-Led LLM Teams: Openlayer” Gemini 3.5 Flash · AI governance · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Openlayer's own guide emphasizes that tools often fall short of real enforcement, which can lead to false confidence in governance.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · AI governance · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Openlayer, over the 3 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Openlayer was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Trustible2 of 31Not among the top eight

Credo AI2 of 30Not among the top eight

Bifrost1 of 30Not among the top eight

CogniGuard1 of 30Not among the top eight

Collibra1 of 30Not among the top eight

Collibra AI1 of 30Not among the top eight

Drata1 of 30Not among the top eight

IBM watsonx.governance1 of 30Not among the top eight

OneTrust AI Governance1 of 30Not among the top eight

Strac1 of 30Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Openlayer. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 3 answers that named Openlayer and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

openlayer.comYour site3

adaptivesecurity.com2

anaconda.com2

modulos.ai2

trustible.ai2

agility-at-scale.com1

ai-identity.co1

aiagentstore.ai1

arthur.ai1

aws.amazon.com1

Thirteen of the sixteen domain citations in answers naming Openlayer came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

openlayer.com/blog/ai-governance-tool-evaluation-guide3

trustible.ai/types-of-ai-governance-platforms2

adaptivesecurity.com/blog/ai-governance-risk-assessment1

adaptivesecurity.com/blog/ai-governance-tools1

agility-at-scale.com/ai/governance/ai-governance-tools-and-technology1

ai-identity.co/vs/credo-ai1

aiagentstore.ai/ai-agent/maxim-ai-bifrost1

anaconda.com/guides/ai-compliance1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on openlayer.com

580

subdomains included

Content

188

counted in the table below

Documentation

351

Product · Integration

7 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	149	53	2026-09-29	LLM gateways, AI governance
Glossary or explainer	19	0	2026-06-03
Comparison	15	5	2026-09-17
Case study	2	0	2025-03-27
Report or ebook	2	undated
Template or tool	1	0	2026-04-06

Most recent

2026-09-29Ai governance tool evaluation guide blog
2026-09-23Introducing jevals agent evals guardrails blog
2026-09-17The 10 best AI agent frameworks for production teams (updated September 2026) | Openlayer blog
2026-09-17Llm coding benchmarks complete guide blog
2026-09-17Langsmith reviews pricing alternatives comparison
2026-09-17Embedding models rag retrieval blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page openlayer.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Openlayer

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Openlayer is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: the AI governance and observability platform for regulated enterprises: one place to test, monitor, and govern every model, agent, and AI system your company runs.
openlayer.com
For: regulated enterprises in industries such as insurance, financial services, telecommunications, and healthcare
openlayer.com
Price stated: Basic; Enterprise openlayer.com/pricing
Free plan or trial: free Basic plan openlayer.com
Certifications: SOC 2 Type II certifiedSOC 2 Type IISOC 2 Bridge Letter
Hosting: USEU
Customers named: Jericho SecurityKPN TelecommunicationsF500 Global Insurance FirmSun LifeGallagherRogersKPNComcast
Not stated on the pages read: Starting price, integrations

What Openlayer's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: openlayer.com, openlayer.com/pricing, trust.openlayer.com, openlayer.com/product/gateway, openlayer.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Openlayer's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Openlayer, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Openlayer by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Openlayer is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Openlayer, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.