Index › Vendors › Okta/Auth0 · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Okta/Auth0

3Judge labels

0First choices

3Negative labels

3 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

2 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Okta/Auth0 was named 2 times in CIAM, where Auth0 led with 22%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market71 of 74

under the label threshold

Enterprise43 of 60

under the label threshold

In ciam · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Okta/Auth0 for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Customer identity and access management	Identity and access	0%	71 of 74	100%	2	under 10 labels · led by Auth0 at 22%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Okta/Auth0 yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Okta/Auth0 across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative3 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Platforms with Significant Security Concerns ### Okta / Auth0 ... Pattern of security issues” Kimi K2 · CIAM · negative prompt · hard negative

“Okta/Auth0 | Costly at enterprise scale; complex configs.” Grok 4.1 Fast · CIAM · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Okta/Auth0, over the 3 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Okta/Auth0 was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

IDMerit2 of 30Not in the top three

Keycloak2 of 30Not in the top three

WorkOS2 of 30Not in the top three

FusionAuth1 of 31Not in the top three

Amazon Cognito1 of 30Not in the top three

Descope1 of 30Not in the top three

Firebase Authentication1 of 30Not in the top three

ForgeRock1 of 30Not in the top three

IBM Verify1 of 30Not in the top three

IDScan.net1 of 30Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Okta/Auth0. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 3 answers that named Okta/Auth0 and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com2

guptadeepak.com2

idmworks.com2

nhimg.org2

tevora.com2

zyphe.com2

appsecure.security1

avatier.com1

bestdevops.com1

bleepingcomputer.com1

No domain is on file for Okta/Auth0, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

g2.com/categories/customer-identity-and-access-management-ciam2

guptadeepak.com/top-5-enterprise-ciam-platforms-in-depth-comparison2

idmworks.com/insight/customer-identity-and-access-management2

zyphe.com/resources/blog/kyc-idv-breach-tracker2

appsecure.security/blog/penetration-testing-for-customer-data-platforms1

avatier.com/blog/support-chaos-iam-service-model1

bestdevops.com/top-10-customer-iam-ciam-platforms-features-pros-cons-comparison1

bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/okta-says-its-support-system-was-breached-using-stolen-1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Okta/Auth0

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Okta/Auth0; a claim can dispute any of them.

Okta / Auth0 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Okta/Auth0's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Okta/Auth0, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at the vendor's own domain is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.