AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Nmap · October 2026 Edition
4 categories · Named, not ranked

Nmap

10Judge labels
1First choices
1Negative labels
6 / 14Models named it
4Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
6 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Nmap was named 6 times in OT/IoT security and 3 other categories, where Microsoft Defender for IoT led with 21%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In ot/iot security · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Nmap for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
OT and IoT securitySecurity operations2%15 of 1070%1under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Defender for IoT at 21%
Attack surface managementSecurity operations0%30 of 1000%3under 10 labels · led by Intruder at 49%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Penetration testing as a serviceSecurity operations0%62 of 820%1under 10 labels · led by Cobalt at 45%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Vulnerability management platformsSecurity operations0%34 of 770%1under 10 labels · led by Rapid7 InsightVM at 30%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Nmap yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Nmap across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.2000101
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash11002
Kimi K200202
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500101
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained9 labels1
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative10 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Asset Discovery: Nmap ... It is the industry standard for inventory.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · OT/IoT security · budget prompt · first choice
“Essential for simply finding what devices are on your network” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Vuln management · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Nmap, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Nmap was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Intruder6 of 103Not among the top eight
OWASP Amass4 of 101Not among the top eight
Attaxion3 of 102Not among the top eight
Detectify3 of 100Not among the top eight
OpenVAS3 of 100Not among the top eight
Rapid7 InsightVM3 of 100Not among the top eight
Tenable Vulnerability Management3 of 100Not among the top eight
Aikido Security2 of 100Not among the top eight
Burp Suite2 of 100Not among the top eight
CrowdStrike2 of 100Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Nmap. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 8 of the 10 answers that named Nmap and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

attaxion.com5
g2.com5
slashdot.org4
thectoclub.com4
guideflow.com3
intruder.io3
it-ai-index.com3
itechguides.com3
scanreview.io3
sourceforge.net3

Thirty-six of the thirty-six domain citations in answers naming Nmap came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on nmap.org
1,518
subdomains included
Content
47
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
0 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
News or press19undated
Blog15undated
Report or ebook13undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page nmap.org exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Nmap

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Nmap is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
free and open source utility for network discovery and security auditing
For
systems and network administrators
Price stated
free download nmap.org
Free plan or trial
free download nmap.org
Not stated on the pages read
Starting price, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers

What Nmap's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: nmap.org. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Nmap's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Nmap, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Nmap by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Nmap is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Nmap, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at nmap.org is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.