IT AI Index

Index › Vendors › Nimblr Security Awareness · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Nimblr Security Awareness

4Judge labels

0First choices

4Negative labels

4 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

4 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Nimblr Security Awareness was named 4 times in Awareness training, where KnowBe4 led with 42%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market65 of 65

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In awareness training · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Nimblr Security Awareness for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Security awareness training	Security operations	0%	65 of 65	100%	4	under 10 labels · led by KnowBe4 at 42%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Nimblr Security Awareness yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Nimblr Security Awareness across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	1	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	1
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative4 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative4 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid Nimblr Security Awareness – its user feedback highlights spam-filter interference, shallow reporting, limited customization, and a lack of engagement.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Awareness training · negative prompt · hard negative

“Nimblr has accumulated consistent criticism on platforms like G2 regarding its stability and engagement levels.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Awareness training · negative prompt · hard negative

“Reviews highlight repetitive phishing emails, spam issues with false positives, inadequate reporting, and a lack of user-friendly features” Mistral Small · Awareness training · negative prompt · soft negative

“users note limited customization and some phishing/email/reporting issues, so it may be a mismatch” GPT-5.4 mini · Awareness training · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Nimblr Security Awareness, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Nimblr Security Awareness was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

KnowBe43 of 40Not in the top three

Adaptive Security1 of 40Not in the top three

Barracuda1 of 40Not in the top three

Cisco1 of 40Not in the top three

CyberGuard3601 of 40Not in the top three

Hoxhunt1 of 40Not in the top three

IRONSCALES1 of 40Not in the top three

Infosec IQ1 of 40Not in the top three

MetaCompliance1 of 40Not in the top three

Phin Security1 of 40Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Nimblr Security Awareness. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 4 answers that named Nimblr Security Awareness and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com4

brside.com3

hoxhunt.com3

adaptivesecurity.com2

expertinsights.com2

kindssecurity.com2

reddit.com2

trustpilot.com2

appsecengineer.com1

au.trustpilot.com1

Twenty-two of the twenty-two domain citations in answers naming Nimblr Security Awareness came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

g2.com/products/nimblr-security-awareness/reviews4

hoxhunt.com/blog/best-security-awareness-training3

brside.com/blog/the-best-security-awareness-training-platforms--an-honest-comparison2

expertinsights.com/security-awareness-training/the-top-security-awareness-training-platfor2

g2.com/products/knowbe4-security-awareness-training/reviews2

kindssecurity.com/blog/is-knowbe4-worth-it-in-2026-inside-the-1.9-star-trustpilot-rating2

trustpilot.com/review/knowbe4.com2

adaptivesecurity.com/blog/ai-security-training-platform-limitations1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Nimblr Security Awareness's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Nimblr Security Awareness, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at nimblrsecurity.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.