AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Nikto · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Named, not ranked

Nikto

11Judge labels
0First choices
6Negative labels
8 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
8 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Nikto was named 8 times in DAST and 1 other category, where OWASP ZAP led with 29%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In dast · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Nikto for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Dynamic application security testingDeveloper platform0%56 of 5857%7under 10 labels · led by OWASP ZAP at 29%
Attack surface managementSecurity operations0%72 of 1000%1under 10 labels · led by Intruder at 49%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Nikto yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Nikto across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501001
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00011
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.2000000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00112
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00011
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00101
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00011
Muse Glimmer 30B01001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained6 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative5 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative11 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Other free/open options often paired with ZAP for a budget stack are Nuclei, Dastardly, Wapiti and Nikto” Muse Glimmer 30B · DAST · budget prompt · alternative
“A lightweight, open-source web server scanner that's simple to use and requires minimal resources.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · DAST · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“These are often OWASP ZAP or Nikto wrapped in a custom UI, sold at enterprise prices.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · DAST · negative prompt · hard negative
“Nikto is a *web server* scanner, not a true application-level DAST tool.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · DAST · negative prompt · hard negative
“Nikto is not a modern web application scanner... If you try to use it as your primary DAST, you will have a massive blindspot.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · DAST · negative prompt · soft negative
“Nikto or Nuclei as your *only* DAST tool. They can be useful for server-level checks or targeted, template-based tests” GPT-6 Luna · DAST · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Nikto, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Nikto was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
OWASP ZAP10 of 117Not among the top eight
Acunetix6 of 110Not among the top eight
Arachni6 of 110Not among the top eight
Burp Suite5 of 111Not among the top eight
Nuclei5 of 110Not among the top eight
w3af4 of 110Not among the top eight
HCL AppScan3 of 110Not among the top eight
Intruder3 of 110Not among the top eight
StackHawk3 of 110Not among the top eight
Checkmarx One2 of 110Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Nikto. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 9 of the 11 answers that named Nikto and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

getastra.com6
escape.tech5
aikido.dev4
appsecsanta.com4
getautonoma.com4
github.com3
pentest.ae3
safeguard.sh3
securityboulevard.com3
aimultiple.com2

No domain is on file for Nikto, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where Nikto stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Searches for its name, Google
4,400 a month (“nikto”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
657 a month
Its own site
No site of its own on file, so no site figures

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 56 of 58 in DAST
Segment leader
29%
OWASP ZAP
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
11 answers
Its own site cited
No site on file to match

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Follow Nikto

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Nikto's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Nikto, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Nikto by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Nikto is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Nikto, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at the vendor's own domain is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.