AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Microsoft Sentinel plus Security Copilot · October 2026 Edition
Microsoft · 1 category · Named, not ranked

Microsoft Sentinel plus Security Copilot

5Judge labels
1First choices
0Negative labels
3 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Microsoft Sentinel plus Security Copilot was named 2 times in AI SOC agents, where Dropzone AI led with 24%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In ai soc agents · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Microsoft Sentinel plus Security Copilot for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
AI SOC agentsSecurity operations2%20 of 1040%2under 10 labels · led by Dropzone AI at 24%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Microsoft Sentinel plus Security Copilot yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Microsoft Sentinel plus Security Copilot across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small10001
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick01001
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained4 labels1
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative5 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Microsoft Sentinel with Security Copilot is often the top recommendation due to its integration with existing Microsoft tools and competitive pricing” Mistral Small · AI SOC agents · budget prompt · first choice
“a native cloud SIEM with AI copilot agents, suitable for Microsoft E5 shops” Llama 4 Maverick · AI SOC agents · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Microsoft Sentinel plus Security Copilot, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Microsoft Sentinel plus Security Copilot was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Dropzone AI3 of 50Not among the top eight
Prophet Security3 of 50Not among the top eight
Radiant Security3 of 50Not among the top eight
Huntress Managed EDR2 of 52Not among the top eight
D3 Morpheus2 of 51Not among the top eight
Elastic Security2 of 51Not among the top eight
Wazuh2 of 51Not among the top eight
Conifers CognitiveSOC2 of 50Not among the top eight
Intezer AI SOC2 of 50Not among the top eight
Splunk Enterprise Security2 of 50Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Microsoft Sentinel plus Security Copilot. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 5 answers that named Microsoft Sentinel plus Security Copilot and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

resources.rework.com5
underdefense.com5
securityboulevard.com4
checkthat.ai2
huntress.com2
swimlane.com2
us.fitgap.com2
agenticindex.io1
awesomeagents.ai1
aws.amazon.com1

Twenty-five of the twenty-five domain citations in answers naming Microsoft Sentinel plus Security Copilot came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Follow Microsoft Sentinel plus Security Copilot

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Microsoft is the company behind Microsoft Sentinel plus Security Copilot.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
As a managed service, Microsoft Sentinel was the tool needed to gain the necessary visibility and control over our diverse systems and establish a central cybersecurity organization.
For
Körber, ein global agierender Technologiekonzern
Customers named
KörberNVISOSHUEISHA INC.NTT Communications
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting

What Microsoft Sentinel plus Security Copilot's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: microsoft.com/en/customers/story/20130-korber-microsoft-sentinel, microsoft.com/de-de/customers/story/20128-korber-microsoft-sentinel, microsoft.com/en/customers/story/21623-shueisha-microsoft-copilot-for-security, microsoft.com/en/customers/story/20383-ntt-communications-microsoft-security-copilot, microsoft.com/en/customers/story/1511095253017592508-pearson-vue-edu-microsoft-sentinel. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Microsoft Sentinel plus Security Copilot's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Microsoft Sentinel plus Security Copilot, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Microsoft Sentinel plus Security Copilot by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Microsoft Sentinel plus Security Copilot is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Microsoft Sentinel plus Security Copilot, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at microsoft.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.