| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI security platforms | Security operations | 2% | 24 of 233 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by SentinelOne Singularity at 11% | |
| AI SOC agents | Security operations | 0% | 27 of 104 | 0% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Dropzone AI at 24% | |
| SOAR platforms | Security operations | 0% | 20 of 67 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Tines at 41% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Top-rated for single reasoning engine; full L2+ investigations (95% alerts in <2 mins), self-healing integrations” Grok 4.20 · AI SOC agents · comparative prompt · first choice
“D3 Morpheus - offers a flat-rate model for budget certainty” Llama 4 Maverick · AI security · budget prompt · first choice
“Known for flat-rate pricing models, which help with budget certainty, making it suitable for smaller teams” Mistral Small · AI SOC agents · budget prompt · alternative
“For predictable monthly billing: Go with D3 Morpheus.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · AI SOC agents · budget prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 19 of the 19 answers that named D3 Morpheus and are not a share of its labels.
No domain is on file for D3 Morpheus, so its own site is not marked.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when D3 Morpheus's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as D3 Morpheus, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for D3 Morpheus by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: