AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Microsoft Purview Insider Risk · October 2026 Edition
Microsoft · 1 category · Named, not ranked

Microsoft Purview Insider Risk

3Judge labels
1First choices
0Negative labels
1 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Microsoft Purview Insider Risk was named 1 time in Insider risk, where Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management led with 22%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In insider risk · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Microsoft Purview Insider Risk for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Insider risk managementSecurity operations2%18 of 840%1under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management at 22%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Microsoft Purview Insider Risk yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Microsoft Purview Insider Risk across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast10001
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained2 labels1
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative3 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Native M365 integration, privacy-by-design, easy for hybrid teams. | Best if already in MS ecosystem.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Insider risk · scale prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Microsoft Purview Insider Risk, over the 3 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Microsoft Purview Insider Risk was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
DTEX InTERCEPT2 of 30Not among the top eight
Varonis Data Security Platform2 of 30Not among the top eight
Teramind1 of 31Not among the top eight
Above Security1 of 30Not among the top eight
Code42 Incydr1 of 30Not among the top eight
Coro1 of 30Not among the top eight
Cyberhaven1 of 30Not among the top eight
Kickidler1 of 30Not among the top eight
LivingSecurity1 of 30Not among the top eight
Proofpoint ITM1 of 30Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Microsoft Purview Insider Risk. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 3 answers that named Microsoft Purview Insider Risk and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

insiderisk.io3
peerspot.com3
cyberhaven.com2
exabeam.com2
gartner.com2
gitnux.org2
livingsecurity.com2
riskpublishing.com2
thehackernews.com2
venn.com2

Twenty-two of the twenty-two domain citations in answers naming Microsoft Purview Insider Risk came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Follow Microsoft Purview Insider Risk

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Microsoft is the company behind Microsoft Purview Insider Risk.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Customers named
EY
Not stated on the pages read
Positioning, who it is for, price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting

What Microsoft Purview Insider Risk's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: microsoft.com/en/customers/story/1551557514622597336-rabobank-banking-capital-markets-microsoft-purview-data-loss-prevention, microsoft.com/en/customers/story/1551283378331954333-fannie-mae-banking-capital-markets-microsoft-purview-data-loss-prevention, microsoft.com/en/customers/story/1561435699311519612-ey-partner-professional-services-microsoft-purview-information-protection. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Microsoft Purview Insider Risk's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Microsoft Purview Insider Risk, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Microsoft Purview Insider Risk by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Microsoft Purview Insider Risk is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Microsoft Purview Insider Risk, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at microsoft.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.