AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Microsoft Excel · October 2026 Edition
Microsoft · 2 categories · Named, not ranked

Microsoft Excel

4Judge labels
1First choices
1Negative labels
2 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Microsoft Excel was named 3 times in Cyber risk quant and 1 other category, where CyberSaint CyberStrong led with 25%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In cyber risk quant · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Microsoft Excel for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Cyber risk quantificationSecurity operations2%14 of 1160%2under 10 labels · led by CyberSaint CyberStrong at 25%
Business continuity managementSecurity operations0%75 of 1140%1under 10 labels · led by LogicManager at 24%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Microsoft Excel yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Microsoft Excel across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00101
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash10102
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained3 labels1
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative4 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“the "best" tool is typically Microsoft Excel (or Google Sheets) augmented with specific Open Source templates and libraries” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Cyber risk quant · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Microsoft Excel, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Microsoft Excel was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Google Sheets2 of 40Not among the top eight
BlueDolphin1 of 41Not among the top eight
SafetyCulture1 of 41Not among the top eight
SimpleRisk1 of 41Not among the top eight
Airtable1 of 40Not among the top eight
Archi1 of 40Not among the top eight
Ardoq1 of 40Not among the top eight
Axio1 of 40Not among the top eight
BC in the Cloud1 of 40Not among the top eight
Bizzdesign Horizzon1 of 40Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Microsoft Excel. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 4 answers that named Microsoft Excel and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

devopsschool.com2
us.fitgap.com2
albumi.app1
ardoq.com1
c-risk.com1
capstera.com1
capterra.com.au1
capterra.com.sg1
capterra.ie1
catio.tech1

Twelve of the twelve domain citations in answers naming Microsoft Excel came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where Microsoft Excel stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Searches for its name, Google
135,000 a month (“microsoft excel”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
4,387 a month
Its own site
It sits on Microsoft's site (microsoft.com), so there are no site figures for it alone

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
2%
rank 14 of 116 in cyber risk quant
Segment leader
25%
CyberSaint CyberStrong
First choices
1 across its categories
Named in
4 answers
Its own site cited
in 3 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Names read as Microsoft Excel

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Microsoft Excel; a claim can dispute any of them.
Microsoft Excel (or Google Sheets) 1Microsoft Excel / Google Sheets 1

Follow Microsoft Excel

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Microsoft is the company behind Microsoft Excel.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Customers named
LenovoVIVIDG&J Pepsi-Cola BottlersVirgin MoneyE.ONMilpark Education
Not stated on the pages read
Positioning, who it is for, price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting

What Microsoft Excel's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: microsoft.com, microsoft.com/cs-cz/dynamics-365/pricing-overview, trust.microsoft.com, microsoft.com/cs-cz/dynamics-365/solutions/ai, microsoft.com/cs-cz/isv/marketplace. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Microsoft Excel's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Microsoft Excel, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Microsoft Excel by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Microsoft Excel is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Microsoft Excel, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at microsoft.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.