| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IT financial management | IT operations and endpoint | 4% | 11 of 159 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Nicus ITFM Platform at 9% | |
| Master data management | Data platform | 0% | 28 of 92 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Profisee MDM at 41% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Microsoft Dynamics 365 - designed for mid-size and enterprise teams that want a single system to manage sales, finance, operations, and customer data.” Llama 4 Maverick · IT financial mgmt · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I would recommend Microsoft Dynamics 365 as the default first choice” Perplexity Sonar · IT financial mgmt · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“If you're already in the Microsoft ecosystem → Evaluate Dynamics MDM (or Dataverse)” MiniMax M2.5 · Master data · scale prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 9 of the 9 answers that named Microsoft Dynamics 365 and are not a share of its labels.
Thirty-two of the thirty-two domain citations in answers naming Microsoft Dynamics 365 came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Microsoft Dynamics 365's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: microsoft.com/de-de/dynamics-365, microsoft.com/de-de/dynamics-365/customer-success, microsoft.com/de-de/dynamics-365/solutions/erp, microsoft.com/de-de/dynamics-365/products/sales, microsoft.com/de-de/dynamics-365/products/finance. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Microsoft Dynamics 365's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Microsoft Dynamics 365, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Microsoft Dynamics 365 by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: