Every category where a model named Planview Portfolios for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
IT financial management	IT operations and endpoint	0%	46 of 159	17%	6	under 10 labels · led by Nicus ITFM Platform at 9%
Enterprise architecture tools	IT operations and endpoint	0%	34 of 113	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by SAP LeanIX at 25%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Planview Portfolios yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Planview Portfolios across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1	2
Mistral Small	1	0	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	1
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	2	1	0	3

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct4 labelsNone

Paraphrase16 labels2

Comparative4 labelsNone

Budget-constrained3 labelsNone

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative4 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative33 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Planview is a good choice if agile project and value delivery tracking are key requirements” Mistral Small · IT financial mgmt · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“or a portfolio-led approach with Planview, rather than a full Apptio TBM deployment” Muse Glimmer 30B · IT financial mgmt · direct prompt · alternative

“Planview excels at strategic portfolio roadmapping.” Muse Glimmer 30B · EA tools · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Only 55% recommendation rate on Gartner ... Weak in collaboration, integration” Grok 4.1 Fast · IT financial mgmt · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Planview Portfolios, over the 33 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Planview Portfolios was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

IBM Apptio Cloudability10 of 334Not among the top eight

SAP LeanIX10 of 334Not among the top eight

ServiceNow IT Financial Management9 of 333Not among the top eight

Flexera One8 of 331Not among the top eight

Ardoq8 of 330Not among the top eight

LeanIX7 of 334Not among the top eight

ServiceNow Enterprise Architecture7 of 330Not among the top eight

Nicus ITFM Platform6 of 332Not among the top eight

Bizzdesign Horizzon5 of 330Not among the top eight

ServiceNow APM5 of 330Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Planview Portfolios. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 32 of the 33 answers that named Planview Portfolios and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com21

worldmetrics.org14

gartner.com13

ciopages.com11

ones.com11

thectoclub.com11

gitnux.org10

sourceforge.net10

leanix.net9

qobra.co9

119 of the 119 domain citations in answers naming Planview Portfolios came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

qobra.co/blog/best-financial-management-software9

thectoclub.com/tools/best-it-financial-management-software9

ciopages.com/buyer-guides/it-financial-management8

gartner.com/reviews/market/it-financial-management-tools8

ones.com/blog/best-application-portfolio-management-tools-our-2026-shortlist8

worldmetrics.org/best/it-financial-management-software8

blog.invgate.com/itfm-software7

g2.com/categories/it-financial-management-itfm7

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

planview.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Planview Portfolios takes 0% of first choices and Nicus ITFM Platform takes 9%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “it financial management platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “it financial management platforms”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 170 a month (“planview portfolios”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 5 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 126,803 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 13,791 · 955 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 8,365
Paid Google search: 1 searches its ads show for, about 0 clicks and $0 a month (estimate)

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

120+ ads · 86 text, 34 image · 120 shown in the last 30 days

First shown October 2021, as Planview, Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 28 in the year, 92 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 46 of 159 in IT financial mgmt

Segment leader

Nicus ITFM Platform

First choices: 2 across its categories
Named in: 33 answers
Its own site cited: in 32 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on planview.com

7,488

subdomains included

Content

4,295

counted in the table below

Documentation

879

Product · Integration

298 · 104

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest
Blog	3,349	7	2026-09-24
News or press	347	0	2021-11-03
Report or ebook	283	0	2025-11-20
Conference or event	98	0	2025-03-26
Glossary or explainer	68	0	2026-05-14
Comparison	65	0	2026-03-24
Webinar or virtual event	54	0	2026-06-09
Case study	19	undated
Template or tool	9	0	2026-03-02
Podcast or video	3	undated

Most recent

2026-09-24The replanning problem speed wont save your roadmap blog
2026-09-24Product development blog
2026-09-17The rd decision problem behind every late product launch blog
2026-09-15Build the portfolio practice your organization needs blog
2026-09-15Strategic portfolio management blog
2026-07-21What we believe recognition in spm signals blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page planview.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Planview Portfolios

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Planview Portfolios; a claim can dispute any of them.

Planview 5Planview (including Apptio Targetprocess) 1

Follow Planview Portfolios

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Planview Portfolios is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Certifications: CSA STARISO/IEC 27001ISO/IEC 27701SOC 2
Not stated on the pages read: Positioning, who it is for, price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting, customers

What Planview Portfolios's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: planview.com, trust.planview.com, planview.com/platform/ai, planview.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Planview Portfolios's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Planview Portfolios, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Planview Portfolios by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Planview Portfolios is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Planview Portfolios, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.