Index › Products › Microsoft AI Builder · October 2026 Edition

Microsoft · 1 category · Named, not ranked

Microsoft AI Builder

3Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

2 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

2 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Microsoft AI Builder was named 2 times in Document processing, where Nanonets led with 32%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business44 of 96

under the label threshold

Mid-market29 of 89

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In document processing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Microsoft AI Builder for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Intelligent document processing	Data platform	0%	29 of 89	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Nanonets at 32%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Microsoft AI Builder yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Microsoft AI Builder across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained3 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative3 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“may be attractive if your company already uses the Power Platform” Perplexity Sonar · Document processing · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Microsoft AI Builder, over the 3 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Microsoft AI Builder was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Parseur2 of 32Not among the top eight

Docsumo2 of 30Not among the top eight

Nanonets2 of 30Not among the top eight

Lido1 of 31Not among the top eight

ABBYY Vantage1 of 30Not among the top eight

Amazon Textract1 of 30Not among the top eight

DocuSign IAM1 of 30Not among the top eight

FileCenter1 of 30Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Microsoft AI Builder. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 3 answers that named Microsoft AI Builder and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

docsumo.com3

jotform.com3

raftlabs.com3

thedigitalprojectmanager.com3

adoption.microsoft.comYour site2

business.com2

extend.ai2

g2.com2

gartner.com2

klippa.com2

Twenty-two of the twenty-four domain citations in answers naming Microsoft AI Builder came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

docsumo.com/blog/the-best-intelligent-document-processing-software3

jotform.com/ai/agents/best-ai-document-processing-tools3

raftlabs.com/blog/top-intelligent-document-processing-companies3

thedigitalprojectmanager.com/tools/intelligent-document-processing-software3

adoption.microsoft.com/en-us/intelligent-document-processing2

business.com/categories/document-management-software2

extend.ai/resources/best-idp-tools-document-processing2

g2.com/categories/intelligent-document-processing-idp2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Follow Microsoft AI Builder

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Microsoft is the company behind Microsoft AI Builder.

ShowHide

On record

Company records

Also from Microsoft: Microsoft 365, Microsoft 365 Admin Center, Microsoft 365 Administration, Microsoft 365 Backup, Microsoft 365 Compliance Center, Microsoft 365 Copilot, Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat, Microsoft 365 DSC and 164 more

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Kom i gang med det grunnleggende om kunstig intelligens, og lær hvordan organisasjoner på tvers av bransjer bruker generativ kunstig intelligens og ansvarlig KI-fremgangsmåter for å drive innovasjon og forretningsverdi.
microsoft.com/nb-no/ai/ai-101
Free plan or trial: Prøv kostnadsfritt microsoft.com/nb-no/power-platform
Integrations claimed: 1500 microsoft.com/nb-no/power-platform
Customers named: HertzEvriHEINEKENT-MobileBritish Heart FoundationLenovoVIVIDG&J Pepsi-Cola Bottlers
Not stated on the pages read: Who it is for, price, starting price, certifications, hosting

What Microsoft AI Builder's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: microsoft.com/nb-no/ai, microsoft.com/nb-no/power-platform, microsoft.com/nb-no/ai/ai-101, microsoft.com/nb-no/power-platform/ai, microsoft.com/nb-no/dynamics-365/solutions/ai. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Microsoft AI Builder's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Microsoft AI Builder, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Microsoft AI Builder by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Microsoft AI Builder is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Microsoft AI Builder, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.