| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DDI and IP address management | Network and edge | 11% | 3 of 115 | 0% | 11 | accepted challenger | |
| Network monitoring and management | Network and edge | 0% | 38 of 78 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Auvik at 26% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“ManageEngine OpUtils is typically the most cost-effective standalone IPAM with DHCP scope monitoring.” Muse Glimmer 30B · DDI and IPAM · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend starting with ManageEngine OpUtils or SolarWinds IP Address Manager” MiniMax M2.5 · DDI and IPAM · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“ManageEngine OpUtils is the best fit for most mid‑sized B2B organizations right now.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · DDI and IPAM · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“For most mid-sized B2B companies, I'd recommend ManageEngine OpUtils” Kimi K2 · DDI and IPAM · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 33 of the 36 answers that named ManageEngine OpUtils and are not a share of its labels.
162 of the 162 domain citations in answers naming ManageEngine OpUtils came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What ManageEngine OpUtils's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: manageengine.com/it/oputils, manageengine.com/it/oputils/ip-tools.html, manageengine.com/it/oputils/ip-monitor.html, manageengine.com/it/oputils/ip-scanner.html, manageengine.com/it/oputils/ip-toolset.html. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ManageEngine OpUtils's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ManageEngine OpUtils, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for ManageEngine OpUtils by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
ManageEngine OpUtils is among the products AI models recommend first in DDI and IP address management this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.