1 category · RankedphpIPAM
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DDI and IP address management | Network and edge | 9% | 4 of 115 | 9% | 22 | accepted challenger |
Movement
By model
How each model treated phpIPAM across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“the best fit is often an open-source tool such as phpIPAM or Gesti\u00f3IP for solo users and small teams” Perplexity Sonar · DDI and IPAM · budget prompt · first choice
“Very Tight Budget / Tech-Savvy | Open Source (phpIPAM) + Cloud DNS | Free / Low” Qwen 3.7 Flash · DDI and IPAM · budget prompt · first choice
“If you can self-host, phpIPAM is the most popular and capable free option.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · DDI and IPAM · budget prompt · first choice
“most budget-constrained teams start with phpIPAM or GestiÓIP for IPAM” Muse Glimmer 30B · DDI and IPAM · budget prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“If you're a small team with no dedicated network engineers, these can become a liability.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · DDI and IPAM · negative prompt · soft negative
“using them as your core DDI platform carries operational risk” Gemini 3.5 Flash · DDI and IPAM · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as phpIPAM, over the 64 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and phpIPAM was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 60 of the 64 answers that named phpIPAM and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
235 of the 235 domain citations in answers naming phpIPAM came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
phpipam.net is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, phpIPAM takes 9% of first choices and BlueCat Micetro takes 15%.ShowHide
Search and answers
In search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 1,000 a month (“phpipam”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 5 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 1,028 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 64 · 27 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 720
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This edition- First choices
- 13 across its categories
- Named in
- 64 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 60 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHide| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News or press | 26 | undated | |||
| Blog | 22 | 0 | 2026-05-20 |
Most recent
- 2026-05-20Phpipam installation on ubuntu 26 04 LTS blog
- 2026-05-10Phpipam v1 8 released blog
- 2024-11-06Phpipam v1 7 released blog
- 2023-01-23Phpipam installation on centos7 php8 nginx blog
- 2022-05-03Phpipam v1 5 released blog
- 2019-07-02Phpipam v1 4 released blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page phpipam.net exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read October 5, 2026.
Follow phpIPAM
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
phpIPAM is its own company.ShowHide
The company
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- free, open source IP address management tool
- Price stated
- free phpipam.net
- Starting price
- 0.00 phpipam.net
- Free plan or trial
- Download free or try the live demo. phpipam.net
- Not stated on the pages read
- Who it is for, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers
What phpIPAM's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: phpipam.net, phpipam.net/documents/features. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when phpIPAM's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as phpIPAM, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for phpIPAM by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where phpIPAM is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name phpIPAM, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.