Index › Products › Gesti\u00f3IP · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Gesti\u00f3IP

12Judge labels

1First choices

4Negative labels

7 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

5 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Gesti\u00f3IP was named 5 times in DDI and IPAM, where BlueCat Micetro led with 15%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business25 of 103

under the label threshold

Mid-market15 of 115

under the label threshold

Enterprise73 of 83

under the label threshold

In ddi and ipam · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Gesti\u00f3IP for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
DDI and IP address management	Network and edge	2%	15 of 115	40%	5	under 10 labels · led by BlueCat Micetro at 15%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Gesti\u00f3IP yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Gesti\u00f3IP across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	1	2
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative2 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained6 labels1

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative3 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative12 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“the best fit is often an open-source tool such as phpIPAM or Gesti\u00f3IP for solo users and small teams” Perplexity Sonar · DDI and IPAM · budget prompt · first choice

“Best Freemium DDI Option ... Designed specifically for budget-conscious teams” DeepSeek V4 Flash · DDI and IPAM · budget prompt · alternative

“Completely free, keeps your IP database up-to-date automatically” Gemini 3.5 Flash · DDI and IPAM · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“though it requires technical expertise and has limited enterprise support options” Claude Haiku 4.5 · DDI and IPAM · budget prompt · soft negative

“using them as your core DDI platform carries operational risk” Gemini 3.5 Flash · DDI and IPAM · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Gesti\u00f3IP, over the 12 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Gesti\u00f3IP was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

phpIPAM12 of 122Not among the top eight

Infoblox10 of 120Not among the top eight

BlueCat Integrity9 of 120Not among the top eight

SolarWinds IP Address Manager8 of 122Not among the top eight

EfficientIP SOLIDserver7 of 121Not among the top eight

Micetro4 of 121Not among the top eight

ManageEngine OpUtils4 of 120Not among the top eight

NetBox4 of 120Not among the top eight

ManageEngine DDI Central3 of 121Not among the top eight

BlueCat Micetro2 of 121Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Gesti\u00f3IP. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 12 of the 12 answers that named Gesti\u00f3IP and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

devopsschool.com8

sourceforge.net8

blog.domotz.com6

itechguides.com6

bluecatnetworks.com5

zdns.com5

cotocus.com4

g2.com4

manageengine.com4

peerspot.com4

No domain is on file for Gesti\u00f3IP, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

devopsschool.com/blog/top-10-ddi-dns-dhcp-ipam-platforms-features-pros-cons-comparison7

blog.domotz.com/all/ipam-solutions6

cotocus.com/blog/top-10-ddi-dns-dhcp-ipam-platforms-features-pros-cons-comparison4

itechguides.com/best/ip-address-management-software4

zdns.com/blog/top-5-ddi-management-platforms4

rajeshkumar.xyz/blog/ddi-dns-dhcp-ipam-platforms3

reddit.com/r/networking/comments/v8mcrj/has_anyone_actually_done_a_market_evaluation_of3

sourceforge.net/software/ddi-management3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where Gesti\u00f3IP stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Searches for its name, Google: not counted (“gesti\u00f3ip”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 0 a month
Its own site: No site of its own on file, so no site figures

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 15 of 115 in DDI and IPAM

Segment leader

15%

BlueCat Micetro

First choices: 1 across its categories
Named in: 12 answers
Its own site cited: No site on file to match

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Follow Gesti\u00f3IP

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Gesti\u00f3IP's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Gesti\u00f3IP, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Gesti\u00f3IP by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Gesti\u00f3IP is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Gesti\u00f3IP, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.