Every category where a model named Domotz for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Network monitoring and management	Network and edge	2%	11 of 78	0%	9	under 10 labels · led by Auvik at 26%
Remote monitoring and management	IT operations and endpoint	0%	13 of 62	0%	6	under 10 labels · led by NinjaOne at 47%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
DDI and IP address management	Network and edge	0%	46 of 115	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by BlueCat Micetro at 15%
Infrastructure monitoring	IT operations and endpoint	0%	39 of 79	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Datadog at 28%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Domotz yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Domotz across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	1	2
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	2	0	3
Perplexity Sonar	0	2	0	2
Grok 4.20	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	2	3
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	1	2
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct7 labels2

Paraphrase12 labels4

Comparative9 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained12 labels3

Scale-constrained9 labels3

Negative8 labels2not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative57 labels in all, every segment counted; 12 of the 15 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Auvik or Domotz: These are cloud-based, incredibly easy to deploy, and specialize in automatic network mapping” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Network monitoring · scale prompt · first choice

“Perfect if you have multiple office locations or remote sites and need reliable, low-cost monitoring and remote-access tools.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Network monitoring · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Domotz is a strong alternative because it is highlighted for medium-sized enterprises across multiple sites” Perplexity Sonar · Network monitoring · direct prompt · alternative

“If cost predictability is your priority, Domotz is an exceptional value at $35/site with unlimited devices.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Network monitoring · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Domotz, over the 57 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Domotz was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Paessler PRTG Network Monitor26 of 575Not among the top eight

Zabbix23 of 572Not among the top eight

Auvik21 of 572Not among the top eight

Atera12 of 574Not among the top eight

NinjaOne12 of 573Not among the top eight

Datadog Network Monitoring12 of 570Not among the top eight

LogicMonitor11 of 570Not among the top eight

ManageEngine OpManager10 of 572Not among the top eight

Nagios10 of 570Not among the top eight

SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor8 of 571Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Domotz. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 56 of the 57 answers that named Domotz and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

blog.domotz.comYour site33

netdata.cloud17

guideflow.com13

learn.g2.com13

thectoclub.com13

domotz.comYour site12

g2.com12

auvik.com11

comparitech.com11

gartner.com11

101 of the 146 domain citations in answers naming Domotz came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

netdata.cloud/resources/best-network-monitoring-tools11

guideflow.com/blog/network-monitoring-tools10

virtana.com/blog/best-network-monitoring-tools10

blog.domotz.com/all/enterprise-network-monitoring-tools9

datamation.com/networks/network-monitoring-software9

kentik.com/kentipedia/best-network-monitoring-tools-20269

blog.domotz.com/all/ipam-solutions8

comparitech.com/net-admin/network-monitoring-tools7

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

domotz.com ranks 2 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Domotz takes 2% of first choices and Auvik takes 26%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “network monitoring tool”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “network monitoring tools”

Searches for its name, Google: 1,900 a month (“domotz”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 52 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 11,525 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 1,856 · 149 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 1,634
Paid Google search: 1 searches its ads show for, about 1 clicks and $93 a month (estimate)

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

83 ads · 56 text, 20 image, 7 video · 9 shown in the last 30 days

First shown November 2024, as Domotz Inc, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 47 in the year, 36 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 11 of 78 in network monitoring

Segment leader

26%

Auvik

First choices: 12 across its categories
Named in: 57 answers
Its own site cited: in 56 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on domotz.com

1,320

subdomains included

Content

435

counted in the table below

Documentation

245

Product · Integration

70 · 191

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	341	2	2026-09-25	RMM, Infra monitoring
News or press	33	0	2022-09-15
Case study	21	undated
Glossary or explainer	13	0	2026-04-28	RMM
Comparison	11	1	2026-09-25
Webinar or virtual event	7	0	2026-06-09
Template or tool	4	0	2021-06-25
Report or ebook	3	0	2025-07-16
Podcast or video	2	undated

Most recent

2026-09-25Domotz mcp server prompting guide blog
2026-09-25Domotz vs auvik pricing comparison
2026-09-25Domotz simple pricing blog
2026-06-09Msp webinars webinar or virtual event
2026-05-20Domotz mcp server launch blog
2026-05-06Unified alerts blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page domotz.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Domotz

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Domotz is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Agent-native network monitoring & management
domotz.com
For: MSP & IT Providers; Enterprise IT; System Integrators; Security Professionals; Commercial AV; Residential AV
domotz.com
Price stated: $35 per collector per month, down to $17.50 per site with volume pricing domotz.com
Starting price: 35 domotz.com
Free plan or trial: 14-day free trial. No credit card required. domotz.com
Certifications: SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001
Customers named: CIO SolutionsTRINUSTKAT
Not stated on the pages read: Integrations, hosting

What Domotz's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: domotz.com, domotz.com/pricing.php, trust.domotz.com, domotz.com/features/webhooks.php. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Domotz's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Domotz, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Domotz by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Domotz is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Domotz, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.