IT AI Index

Index › Vendors › ManageEngine OpManager Nexus · September 2026 Edition

ManageEngine · 1 category · Named, not ranked

ManageEngine OpManager Nexus

3Judge labels

1First choices

0Negative labels

3 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. ManageEngine OpManager Nexus was named 3 times in APM, where New Relic led with 54%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market10 of 70

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In apm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named ManageEngine OpManager Nexus for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Application performance monitoring	IT operations and endpoint	2%	10 of 70	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by New Relic at 54%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for ManageEngine OpManager Nexus yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated ManageEngine OpManager Nexus across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative1 label1not counted in share

Budget-constrained2 labels1

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative3 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“ManageEngine OpManager Nexus is the strongest commercial APM choice for hybrid and on-premises environments.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · APM · comparative prompt · first choice

“The best APM tool for a company with a limited budget is ManageEngine OpManager Nexus” Llama 4 Maverick · APM · budget prompt · first choice

“Highlighted as a cost-effective alternative for hybrid and on-premises environments” Qwen 3.7 Flash · APM · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as ManageEngine OpManager Nexus, over the 3 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ManageEngine OpManager Nexus was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

New Relic3 of 31Not in the top three

Datadog3 of 30Not in the top three

SigNoz2 of 31Not in the top three

Dynatrace2 of 30Not in the top three

AppDynamics1 of 30Not in the top three

Atatus1 of 30Not in the top three

CubeAPM1 of 30Not in the top three

Elastic APM1 of 30Not in the top three

Elastic Observability1 of 30Not in the top three

Grafana Cloud1 of 30Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ManageEngine OpManager Nexus. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 3 answers that named ManageEngine OpManager Nexus and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

manageengine.comYour site3

openobserve.ai2

rollbar.com2

apistatuscheck.com1

atatus.com1

cubeapm.com1

drizz.dev1

middleware.io1

newrelic.com1

pflb.us1

Eleven of the fourteen domain citations in answers naming ManageEngine OpManager Nexus came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

manageengine.com/it-operations-management/application-observability/apm-tools-comparison.h3

openobserve.ai/blog/top-10-apm-tools2

rollbar.com/blog/best-apm-tools2

apistatuscheck.com/blog/best-apm-tools-20261

atatus.com/guides/cheapest-apm-solutions1

cubeapm.com/blog/top-apm-tools-features-pricing-usecases1

drizz.dev/post/apm-tools1

middleware.io/blog/apm-tools1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ManageEngine OpManager Nexus's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ManageEngine OpManager Nexus, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at manageengine.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.