AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › ManageEngine OpManager Nexus · October 2026 Edition
ManageEngine · 3 categories · Named, not ranked

ManageEngine OpManager Nexus

12Judge labels
1First choices
1Negative labels
8 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
6 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. ManageEngine OpManager Nexus was named 6 times in AIOps and 2 other categories, where New Relic led with 17%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In aiops · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named ManageEngine OpManager Nexus for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
AIOps platformsIT operations and endpoint0%34 of 930%2under 10 labels · led by New Relic at 17%
Application performance monitoringIT operations and endpoint0%25 of 660%2under 10 labels · led by New Relic at 46%▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Data center infrastructure managementIT operations and endpoint0%76 of 10350%2under 10 labels · led by Sunbird DCIM at 27%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for ManageEngine OpManager Nexus yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated ManageEngine OpManager Nexus across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.2000101
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick01001
Qwen 3.7 Flash01001
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX02013
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase3 labels1
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained3 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative12 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Look at ManageEngine OpManager Nexus (starting at ~$2/asset/year)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · DCIM · budget prompt · alternative
“Best Low-Cost Paid Alternative ... very affordable fixed pricing” Qwen 3.7 Flash · APM · budget prompt · alternative
“Suitable for hybrid, on-premises, and converged observability.” Llama 4 Maverick · APM · negative prompt · alternative
“Best for: Hybrid environments with on-premises needs” GLM 4.7 FlashX · AIOps · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“users report "complex configuration" and performance slowdowns in large network setups, with additional licensing adding to the challenge” GLM 4.7 FlashX · DCIM · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as ManageEngine OpManager Nexus, over the 12 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ManageEngine OpManager Nexus was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
New Relic8 of 123Not among the top eight
Dynatrace5 of 122Not among the top eight
Datadog APM5 of 121Not among the top eight
AppDynamics3 of 120Not among the top eight
BigPanda2 of 121Not among the top eight
Datadog2 of 121Not among the top eight
SigNoz2 of 121Not among the top eight
Grafana Cloud2 of 120Not among the top eight
openDCIM1 of 121Not among the top eight
CubeAPM1 of 120Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ManageEngine OpManager Nexus. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 12 of the 12 answers that named ManageEngine OpManager Nexus and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

manageengine.comYour site10
motadata.com7
g2.com6
guideflow.com4
comparitech.com3
aiopsschool.com2
atatus.com2
coralogix.com2
dcgeeks.com2
dev.to2

Thirty of the forty domain citations in answers naming ManageEngine OpManager Nexus came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Follow ManageEngine OpManager Nexus

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

ManageEngine is the company behind ManageEngine OpManager Nexus.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Full-stack IT operations management and observability platform
Free plan or trial
30-day trial period manageengine.com/network-monitoring/opmanager-addons.html
Customers named
Lorealnasadhlat&tsiemenstime-warneralcatel-lucentsaint-gobain
Not stated on the pages read
Who it is for, price, starting price, integrations, certifications, hosting

What ManageEngine OpManager Nexus's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: manageengine.com/network-monitoring/api-opmanager.html, manageengine.com/network-monitoring/opmanager-addons.html, manageengine.com/network-monitoring/opmanager-galaxy.html, manageengine.com/network-monitoring/opmanager-features.html, manageengine.com/network-monitoring/opmanager-linkedin.html. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ManageEngine OpManager Nexus's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ManageEngine OpManager Nexus, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for ManageEngine OpManager Nexus by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where ManageEngine OpManager Nexus is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name ManageEngine OpManager Nexus, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at manageengine.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.