| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DDI and IP address management | Network and edge | 4% | 12 of 115 | 12% | 8 | under 10 labels · led by BlueCat Micetro at 15% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“ManageEngine DDI Central stands out as an affordable enterprise solution with a clear entry price point.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · DDI and IPAM · budget prompt · first choice
“best budget-conscious commercial pick: ManageEngine DDI Central” GPT-6 Luna · DDI and IPAM · budget prompt · first choice
“Best for: Small-to-medium businesses (SMBs) that want a dedicated, out-of-the-box DDI platform with professional support.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · DDI and IPAM · budget prompt · alternative
“Best for unified DNS/DHCP/IPAM management in a mid-size business context: ManageEngine DDI Central” Perplexity Sonar · DDI and IPAM · direct prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“generally positioned below the top enterprise-heavy platforms” GPT-5.4 mini · DDI and IPAM · direct prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 25 of the 25 answers that named ManageEngine DDI Central and are not a share of its labels.
Eighty-eight of the ninety-seven domain citations in answers naming ManageEngine DDI Central came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What ManageEngine DDI Central's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: manageengine.com/dns-dhcp-ipam/opmanager-integration-with-ddi-central.html, manageengine.com/dns-dhcp-ipam/anomaly-detection-in-dns-dhcp-ddi-central.html, manageengine.com/dns-dhcp-ipam/create-authoritative-zones-using-ddi-central.html, manageengine.com/dns-dhcp-ipam/ManageEngine-OpManager-Plus-DDI-Central-integration.html, manageengine.com/dns-dhcp-ipam/whats-new/DDI-central-5100.html. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ManageEngine DDI Central's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ManageEngine DDI Central, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for ManageEngine DDI Central by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: