Small business▲+3Since September 2026: 0% → 3%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
3%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 20 → 8 of 53
1 category · Named, not rankedLoggly
11Judge labels
2First choices
2Negative labels
6 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Loggly was named 2 times in Logs, where Datadog Log Management led with 28%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business8 of 56
3%7 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market25 of 73
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise55 of 66
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In logs · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Loggly for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Log management | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 25 of 73 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Datadog Log Management at 28% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Loggly held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Logs · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 34 → 25 of 66
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 53 → 51 of 62
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Logs | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 34 → 25 of 73 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Loggly across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Loggly across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labels1
Paraphrase3 labelsNone
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 label1
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative11 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Simplicity and easy setup | Loggly” GPT-5.4 mini · Logs · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Loggly, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Loggly was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Loggly, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Loggly was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Loggly. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 9 of the 11 answers that named Loggly and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
openobserve.ai6
betterstack.com5
coralogix.com4
middleware.io4
cribl.io3
cubeapm.com3
dash0.com3
learn.g2.com3
loggly.comYour site3
us.fitgap.com3
Thirty-four of the thirty-seven domain citations in answers naming Loggly came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
loggly.com ranks 6 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Loggly takes 0% of first choices and Datadog Log Management takes 28%.ShowHide
Search and answers
loggly.com ranks 6 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Loggly takes 0% of first choices and Datadog Log Management takes 28%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “log management platform”
6
Position for “log management platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 480 a month (“loggly”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 5 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 10,559 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 3,009 · 261 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 4,287
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 25 of 73 in logs
Segment leader
28%
Datadog Log Management
- First choices
- 2 across its categories
- Named in
- 11 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 9 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on loggly.com
786
subdomains included
Content
432
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
181 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 400 | 0 | 2026-02-05 | Logs, APM | |
| Glossary or explainer | 8 | undated | APM, Logs | ||
| Conference or event | 7 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 7 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 4 | undated | |||
| Case study | 2 | undated | Logs, APM | ||
| Report or ebook | 2 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 1 | undated | |||
| News or press | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-02-05The human centric stack why logs are the great equalizer in the age of ai blog
- 2025-08-01Slf4j and log4j understanding the differences 2 blog
- 2025-02-20Debugging a net applications with loggly blog
- 2025-01-29Getting the most out of java with solarwinds loggly blog
- 2025-01-08Using solarwinds loggly to get the most out of mongodb structured logging blog
- 2024-12-09Getting the most out of python with solarwinds loggly blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page loggly.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Loggly
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Loggly is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Loggly is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- the world's most popular log analysis & monitoring in the cloud
- For
- For starters; For small business; For growing companies; All-inclusive
- Price stated
- Free trial loggly.com
- Starting price
- 79 loggly.com/plans-and-pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Free trial loggly.com
- Customers named
- ClearCareVivint SolarStanley Black & DeckerNapsterXAPPmediaCreative MarketDatamiBambooHR
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, certifications, hosting
What Loggly's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: loggly.com, loggly.com/plans-and-pricing, trust.loggly.com, loggly.com/product, loggly.com/about/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Loggly's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Loggly, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Loggly by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Loggly is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Loggly, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.