AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Let's Encrypt + Certbot · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Let's Encrypt + Certbot

6Judge labels
2First choices
0Negative labels
4 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Let's Encrypt + Certbot was named 2 times in Certificate management, where Sectigo Certificate Manager led with 27%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In certificate management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Let's Encrypt + Certbot for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Certificate lifecycle managementIdentity and access2%16 of 1040%2under 10 labels · led by Sectigo Certificate Manager at 27%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Let's Encrypt + Certbot yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Let's Encrypt + Certbot across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.510001
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash01001
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase3 labels1
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained1 label1
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative6 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“My top pick for mid-sized B2B: A combination of Let's Encrypt for internal/non-customer-facing certificates + Sectigo for public-facing, customer-trust certificates” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Certificate management · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Free but DIY — no central dashboard, discovery, or governance” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Certificate management · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Let's Encrypt + Certbot, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Let's Encrypt + Certbot was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Sectigo Certificate Manager4 of 61Not among the top eight
Smallstep Certificate Manager3 of 61Not among the top eight
DigiCert ONE3 of 60Not among the top eight
Keyfactor Command3 of 60Not among the top eight
ZeroSSL3 of 60Not among the top eight
AWS Certificate Manager2 of 60Not among the top eight
Caddy2 of 60Not among the top eight
CyberArk Certificate Manager2 of 60Not among the top eight
HashiCorp Vault2 of 60Not among the top eight
Venafi2 of 60Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Let's Encrypt + Certbot. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 6 answers that named Let's Encrypt + Certbot and are not a share of its labels.

Search and answers

letsencrypt.org is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Let's Encrypt + Certbot takes 2% of first choices and Sectigo Certificate Manager takes 27%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “certificate lifecycle management platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “certificate lifecycle management platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Organic visits to its site
about 135,310 a month
Searches its site ranks for
7,841 · 867 in the top three
Sites linking to it
48,528
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
2%
rank 16 of 104 in certificate management
Segment leader
27%
Sectigo Certificate Manager
First choices
2 across its categories
Named in
6 answers
Its own site cited
in 5 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on letsencrypt.org
11,143
subdomains included
Content
264
counted in the table below
Documentation
10,054
Product · Integration
0 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Glossary or explainer20902019-08-31
Comparison3602026-04-15
Report or ebook1302019-03-07
Conference or event302018-08-29
Webinar or virtual event202026-07-02
Template or tool102018-03-25

Most recent

  • 2026-07-02248603 webinar or virtual event
  • 2026-04-15246630 comparison
  • 2026-03-26246162 webinar or virtual event
  • 2019-08-31101013 glossary or explainer
  • 2019-08-31101015 glossary or explainer
  • 2019-08-30101003 glossary or explainer
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page letsencrypt.org exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Let's Encrypt + Certbot

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Let's Encrypt + Certbot is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
A nonprofit providing free TLS certificates to more than 700M700M websites.
For
websites
Price stated
free letsencrypt.org
Free plan or trial
free TLS certificates letsencrypt.org
Certifications
Certificate Authority
Not stated on the pages read
Starting price, integrations, hosting, customers

What Let's Encrypt + Certbot's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: letsencrypt.org. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Let's Encrypt + Certbot's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Let's Encrypt + Certbot, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Let's Encrypt + Certbot by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Let's Encrypt + Certbot is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Let's Encrypt + Certbot, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at letsencrypt.org is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.