AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › ZeroSSL · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

ZeroSSL

48Judge labels
4First choices
8Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
7% in Certificate management for small business buyers
Rank 32 of 104 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 25% of its 12 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of ZeroSSL →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In certificate management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named ZeroSSL for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Certificate lifecycle managementIdentity and access0%32 of 10425%12criticized challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for ZeroSSL yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated ZeroSSL across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501001
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar01001
Grok 4.1 Fast00314
Mistral Small00101
DeepSeek V4 Flash00011
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.501102
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00011

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct6 labels4
Paraphrase5 labelsNone
Comparative11 labels4not counted in share
Budget-constrained11 labelsNone
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative12 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative48 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 9 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Certify The Web or ZeroSSL are also cited as lower-cost options for smaller teams” Perplexity Sonar · Certificate management · budget prompt · alternative
“Best for: Free/low-cost option with more features than Let's Encrypt” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Certificate management · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“ZeroSSL or TrackSSL for affordable monitoring” MiniMax M2.5 · Certificate management · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid budget options like ZeroSSL for anything beyond simple web certs.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Certificate management · negative prompt · hard negative
“be cautious—while the basic management tool is often free, you still need to pay for the actual certificates themselves” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Certificate management · budget prompt · soft negative
“ZeroSSL is described as a low-friction entry if you just need ACME issuance and simple renewal tracking” Muse Glimmer 30B · Certificate management · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as ZeroSSL, over the 48 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ZeroSSL was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Sectigo Certificate Manager26 of 487Not among the top eight
Certify The Web23 of 485Not among the top eight
AWS Certificate Manager20 of 482Not among the top eight
AppViewX CERT+16 of 480Not among the top eight
Venafi15 of 481Not among the top eight
Keyfactor Command14 of 481Not among the top eight
DigiCert Trust Lifecycle Manager12 of 480Not among the top eight
Keyfactor10 of 481Not among the top eight
Certbot9 of 484Not among the top eight
Let's Encrypt9 of 483Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ZeroSSL. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 47 of the 48 answers that named ZeroSSL and are not a share of its labels.

Search and answers

zerossl.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, ZeroSSL takes 0% of first choices and Sectigo Certificate Manager takes 27%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “certificate lifecycle management platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “certificate lifecycle management platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
1,600 a month (“zerossl”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
26 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 9,820 a month
Searches its site ranks for
1,086 · 58 in the top three
Sites linking to it
3,731
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
60 ads · 40 text, 14 video, 6 image · 21 shown in the last 30 days

First shown November 2023, as ZeroSSL GmbH, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 27 in the year, 33 before. 3 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 32 of 104 in certificate management
Segment leader
27%
Sectigo Certificate Manager
First choices
4 across its categories
Named in
48 answers
Its own site cited
in 47 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on zerossl.com
47
subdomains included
Content
8
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
8 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog432026-09-14
Comparison2undated
Glossary or explainer212026-07-07
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page zerossl.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as ZeroSSL

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as ZeroSSL; a claim can dispute any of them.
Zerossl 1

Follow ZeroSSL

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

ZeroSSL is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Free SSL Certificates and SSL Tools
For
For Anyone
Price stated
free zerossl.com
Starting price
0 zerossl.com/pricing
Free plan or trial
Free SSL certificates issued instantly online zerossl.com
Customers named
MetabaseUgreenRakuten
Not stated on the pages read
Integrations, certifications, hosting

What ZeroSSL's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: zerossl.com, zerossl.com/pricing, zerossl.com/features/acme. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ZeroSSL's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ZeroSSL, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for ZeroSSL by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where ZeroSSL is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name ZeroSSL, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at zerossl.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.