Index › Products › Lacework · October 2026 Edition

4 categories · Named, not ranked

Lacework

9Judge labels

1First choices

2Negative labels

8 / 14Models named it

4Categories

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

4 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Lacework was named 4 times in AI security and 3 other categories, where SentinelOne Singularity led with 11%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market170 of 233

under the label threshold

Enterprise136 of 155

under the label threshold

In ai security · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Lacework for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
AI security platforms	Security operations	0%	170 of 233	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by SentinelOne Singularity at 11%
Breach and attack simulation	Security operations	0%	39 of 74	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Cymulate at 24%
Container and Kubernetes security	Cloud and infrastructure	0%	58 of 77	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Trivy at 22%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
SaaS security posture management	Security operations	0%	93 of 95	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Wing Security at 30%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Lacework yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Lacework across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.20	0	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained2 labelsNone

Scale-constrained5 labels1

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative9 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Wiz, Lacework, or Orca Security - if you use AWS/Azure/GCP” Claude Haiku 4.5 · BAS · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid: Enterprise-focused platforms like ... Lacework” DeepSeek V4 Flash · SSPM · budget prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Lacework, over the 9 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Lacework was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Wiz7 of 90Not among the top eight

Prisma Cloud4 of 90Not among the top eight

Aqua Security3 of 90Not among the top eight

Sysdig Secure3 of 90Not among the top eight

Snyk Container2 of 91Not among the top eight

Falco2 of 90Not among the top eight

HiddenLayer2 of 90Not among the top eight

Orca Security2 of 90Not among the top eight

Qualys2 of 90Not among the top eight

Snyk2 of 90Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Lacework. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 9 answers that named Lacework and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

sourceforge.net2

startupstash.com2

us.fitgap.com2

1point1.com1

alibabacloud.com1

arrow.com1

capterra.co.uk1

checkmarx.com1

cloud.google.com1

cloudeagle.ai1

No domain is on file for Lacework, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

1point1.com/blogs/ai-providers-it-security1

alibabacloud.com/en/about/gartner-container1

arrow.com/ecs-media/8708/the-forrester-wave-cloud-security-gateways-q4-2019.pdf1

capterra.co.uk/directory/32916/container-security/software1

checkmarx.com/learn/container-security/10-container-security-tools-to-know-in-20261

cloud.google.com/blog/products/containers-kubernetes/a-leader-in-2024-gartner-magic-quadra1

cloud.google.com/resources/gartner-magic-quadrant-containers1

cloudeagle.ai/blogs/best-saas-security-posture-management-tools1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Lacework

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Lacework; a claim can dispute any of them.

Lacework/SentinelOne 1

Follow Lacework

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Lacework's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Lacework, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Lacework by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Lacework is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Lacework, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.