IT AI Index

Index › Products › KPMG Cyber Risk Insights · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

KPMG Cyber Risk Insights

4Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

4 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

1 label, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. KPMG Cyber Risk Insights was named 1 time in Cyber risk quant, where CyberSaint CyberStrong led with 25%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market51 of 116

under the label threshold

Enterprise22 of 74

under the label threshold

In cyber risk quant · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named KPMG Cyber Risk Insights for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Cyber risk quantification	Security operations	0%	51 of 116	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by CyberSaint CyberStrong at 25%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for KPMG Cyber Risk Insights yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated KPMG Cyber Risk Insights across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative3 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative4 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“KPMG CRI is unmatched.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Cyber risk quant · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as KPMG Cyber Risk Insights, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and KPMG Cyber Risk Insights was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

SAFE Security3 of 43Not among the top eight

Axio3 of 40Not among the top eight

Balbix3 of 40Not among the top eight

Kovrr3 of 40Not among the top eight

Bitsight2 of 40Not among the top eight

Axio3601 of 40Not among the top eight

Bitsight Financial Quantification1 of 40Not among the top eight

CyQuant1 of 40Not among the top eight

CyberSaint CyberStrong1 of 40Not among the top eight

Mastercard Cyber Quant1 of 40Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named KPMG Cyber Risk Insights. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 4 answers that named KPMG Cyber Risk Insights and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

kpmg.comYour site4

axio.com3

kovrr.com3

safe.security3

aviatrix.ai2

bankinfosecurity.com2

bitsight.com2

cybersaint.io2

forrester.com2

prnewswire.com2

Twenty-one of the twenty-five domain citations in answers naming KPMG Cyber Risk Insights came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

aviatrix.ai/learn-center/pqc/cyber-risk-quantification2

axio.com/insights/axio-leader-forrester-wave2

bankinfosecurity.com/safe-axio-kpmg-dominate-cyber-risk-quantification-rankings-a-288372

kovrr.com/blog-post/the-best-cyber-risk-quantification-tools-in-2026-a-buyers-guide2

kpmg.com/uk/en/services/consulting/cyber-security.html2

kpmg.com/xx/en/our-insights/ai-and-technology/kpmg-named-leader-in-cyber-risk-quantificati2

prnewswire.com/news-releases/independent-research-firm-names-safe-a-leader-in-cyber-risk-q2

riskpublishing.com/best-cyber-risk-quantification-platforms-compar2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

kpmg.com ranks 2 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, KPMG Cyber Risk Insights takes 0% of first choices and CyberSaint CyberStrong takes 25%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “cyber risk quantification tool”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “cyber risk quantification tools”

–

not in the top ten

Organic visits to its site: about 323,375 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 40,482 · 3,953 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 100,110
Paid Google search: 19 searches its ads show for, about 218 clicks and $8,582 a month (estimate)

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

41+ ads · 41 text · 41 shown in the last 30 days

First shown July 2022, as KPMG LLP, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 37 in the year, 4 before. 79 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 51 of 116 in cyber risk quant

Segment leader

25%

CyberSaint CyberStrong

First choices: 0 across its categories
Named in: 4 answers
Its own site cited: in 4 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on kpmg.com

10,008

subdomains included

Content

3,600

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

29 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	2,801	159	2026-10-01	TPRM, SCA
News or press	495	37	2026-09-08
Conference or event	164	47	2026-11-01
Case study	90	1	2026-09-08
Podcast or video	23	16	2026-09-24
Webinar or virtual event	10	5	2026-09-21
Comparison	9	2	2026-09-14	ITAM, ITSM
Report or ebook	4	1	2026-09-22
Template or tool	2	undated
Glossary or explainer	2	0	2026-03-25

Most recent

2026-11-01Finance consolidation transformation journey conference or event
2026-11-01Insurance soiree conference or event
2026-11-01Regional market focus conference or event
2026-10-01Digital treasury summit conference or event
2026-10-01India mobile congress 2026 conference or event
2026-10-01Agrasar bharat manch blog

Events in person

Upcoming

October 9, 2026FastighetsseminariumVasagatan 16, Stockholm, Sweden · hosts
October 16, 2026FastighetsseminariumMårten Krakowgatan 2, våning 12, Arena Platinan, Göteborg, Sweden · hosts
October 21, 2026Stora SkattedagenAt Six, Brunkebergstorg 6, Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden · hosts
October 22, 2026FastighetsseminariumNordenskiöldsgatan 8, Malmö, Sweden · hosts

Last twelve months

September 18, 2026Kurser i finansiella instrumentKPMG:s kontor, Vasagatan 16, Stockholm, Stockholm · hosted
September 17, 2026Kurser i finansiella instrumentKPMG:s kontor, Vasagatan 16, Stockholm, Stockholm · hosted
August 26, 2026VAT in the Digital Age: Insights on ViDA with the Swedish Tax AgencyKPMG Office, Vasagatan 16, Stockholm, Stockholm · hosted

As the event pages on kpmg.com state them, read September 28, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page kpmg.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as KPMG Cyber Risk Insights

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as KPMG Cyber Risk Insights; a claim can dispute any of them.

KPMG Cyber Risk Insights (CRI) 1

Follow KPMG Cyber Risk Insights

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

KPMG Cyber Risk Insights is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Bringing together global insights, people & tech - to spark innovation
kpmg.com/ie/en/services/platform-x.html
Not stated on the pages read: Who it is for, price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers

What KPMG Cyber Risk Insights's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: kpmg.com, kpmg.com/ie/en/services/deal-advisory/strategy/pricing.html, kpmg.com/uk/en/services/tax/business/compliance/tax-connect.html, kpmg.com/ie/en/services/platform-x.html. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when KPMG Cyber Risk Insights's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as KPMG Cyber Risk Insights, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for KPMG Cyber Risk Insights by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where KPMG Cyber Risk Insights is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name KPMG Cyber Risk Insights, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.