IT AI Index

Index › Vendors › Intel 471 · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Intel 471

9Judge labels

0First choices

1Negative labels

6 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

4 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Intel 471 was named 4 times in Threat intel, where NordStellar led with 13%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market37 of 128

under the label threshold

Enterprise23 of 105

under the label threshold

In threat intel · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Intel 471 for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Threat intelligence platforms	Security operations	0%	37 of 128	25%	4	under 10 labels · led by NordStellar at 13%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Intel 471 yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Intel 471 across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	1	1	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labelsNone

Paraphrase3 labelsNone

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative9 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Intel 471 is a strong contender, albeit at a slightly higher price point.” MiniMax M2.5 · Threat intel · direct prompt · alternative

“Excellent for criminal-market and human-curated signals” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Threat intel · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“usually start in the mid-five-to-six-figure range” Kimi K2 · Threat intel · direct prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Intel 471, over the 9 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Intel 471 was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Recorded Future9 of 96Not in the top three

Flashpoint6 of 90Not in the top three

ZeroFox3 of 90Not in the top three

AlienVault OTX2 of 90Not in the top three

CrowdStrike2 of 90Not in the top three

CrowdStrike Falcon Adversary Intelligence2 of 90Not in the top three

Google Cloud2 of 90Not in the top three

MISP2 of 90Not in the top three

ThreatConnect2 of 90Not in the top three

Anomali1 of 91Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Intel 471. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 8 of the 9 answers that named Intel 471 and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

analyticsinsight.net4

gartner.com4

worldmetrics.org4

cyware.com3

upguard.com3

b2breviews.com2

expertinsights.com2

g2.com2

learn.g2.com2

recordedfuture.com2

Twenty-eight of the twenty-eight domain citations in answers naming Intel 471 came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

analyticsinsight.net/cybersecurity/best-threat-intelligence-platforms3

cyware.com/blog/top-threat-intelligence-platforms-and-solutions3

gartner.com/en/documents/77983533

upguard.com/blog/best-threat-intelligence-platforms-and-vendors3

b2breviews.com/threat-intelligence-platforms2

expertinsights.com/security-operations/top-cybersecurity-intelligence-telemetry-feeds2

learn.g2.com/best-threat-intelligence-tools2

shadowdragon.io/resources/best-threat-intelligence-platforms2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Intel 471's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Intel 471, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at intel471.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.