Every category where a model named Anomali for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Threat intelligence platforms	Security operations	2%	15 of 128	23%	13	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Anomali yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Anomali across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	2	0	0	2
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	1	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	1	1	2
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	2	0	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	2	0	0	2
Kimi K2	0	1	0	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct5 labels1

Paraphrase6 labelsNone

Comparative7 labelsNone

Budget-constrained3 labelsNone

Scale-constrained8 labelsNone

Negative9 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative38 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Recorded Future and Anomali are frequently the top picks for mid‑market teams.” MiniMax M2.5 · Threat intel · direct prompt · first choice

“Indicator distribution into detections → Anomali-style platforms are often evaluated here.” GPT-5.4 mini · Threat intel · comparative prompt · alternative

“Choose ThreatQ or Anomali if you already subscribe to multiple external threat feeds” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Threat intel · comparative prompt · alternative

“Anomali offers deeper operational integration at a higher price point” Kimi K2 · Threat intel · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid enterprise-heavy like Anomali/ThreatConnect unless growing fast.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Threat intel · direct prompt · hard negative

“A traditional TIP (like Anomali, ThreatConnect, or ThreatQuotient) acts as a heavy database... You do not have the cycles to manage complex, noisy, and high-maintenance enterprise TIPs” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Threat intel · scale prompt · soft negative

“Anomali — typically $25,000–$100,000+/year” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Threat intel · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Anomali, over the 38 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Anomali was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Recorded Future32 of 3810Not in the top three

ThreatConnect30 of 382Not in the top three

MISP16 of 381Not in the top three

OpenCTI14 of 382Not in the top three

CrowdStrike8 of 380Not in the top three

Mandiant8 of 380Not in the top three

AlienVault OTX7 of 382Not in the top three

CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence6 of 380Not in the top three

Flashpoint6 of 380Not in the top three

Abuse.ch5 of 380Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Anomali. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 28 of the 38 answers that named Anomali and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

upguard.com15

analyticsinsight.net14

b2breviews.com11

cyware.com9

esecurityplanet.com9

vectra.ai9

learn.g2.com7

tech-insider.org7

cipherssecurity.com6

cyble.com6

Ninety-three of the ninety-three domain citations in answers naming Anomali came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

upguard.com/blog/best-threat-intelligence-platforms-and-vendors15

analyticsinsight.net/cybersecurity/best-threat-intelligence-platforms11

b2breviews.com/threat-intelligence-platforms11

vectra.ai/topics/threat-intelligence-tools9

analyticsinsight.net/cybersecurity/10-best-threat-intelligence-platforms-in-20268

esecurityplanet.com/products/threat-intelligence-platforms8

learn.g2.com/best-threat-intelligence-tools7

tech-insider.org/recorded-future-vs-gti-vs-threatconnect-20267

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Anomali

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Anomali; a claim can dispute any of them.

Anomali (ThreatStream) 2

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Anomali's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Anomali, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at anomali.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.