Every category where a model named Huntress Managed SIEM for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
SIEM platforms	Security operations	2%	7 of 49	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Sentinel at 41%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Huntress Managed SIEM yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Huntress Managed SIEM across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct6 labels1

Paraphrase4 labels2

Comparative9 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative20 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“choose Huntress Managed SIEM or Blumira” Gemini 3.5 Flash · SIEM · direct prompt · first choice

“MSPs/lean teams \u2192 Huntress Managed SIEM” GLM 4.7 FlashX · SIEM · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Huntress Managed SIEM, over the 20 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Huntress Managed SIEM was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Microsoft Sentinel20 of 206Not in the top three

Blumira18 of 2010Not in the top three

Wazuh13 of 201Not in the top three

Elastic Security13 of 200Not in the top three

Rapid7 InsightIDR10 of 202Not in the top three

Splunk7 of 200Not in the top three

Splunk Enterprise Security5 of 201Not in the top three

Datadog Cloud SIEM5 of 200Not in the top three

IBM QRadar5 of 200Not in the top three

Sumo Logic5 of 200Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Huntress Managed SIEM. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 16 of the 20 answers that named Huntress Managed SIEM and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

q-sec.com14

solutionsinsider.com11

nohack.net9

underdefense.com9

reddit.com8

capterra.com7

paloaltonetworks.com7

subrosacyber.com7

threatmatrix.co.uk6

clearnetwork.com5

Eighty-three of the eighty-three domain citations in answers naming Huntress Managed SIEM came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

q-sec.com/siem-knowledge-base/best-siem-for-small-business14

solutionsinsider.com/continuity-and-compliance-solutions/best-siem-tools-for-small-busines11

nohack.net/siem-tools-small-medium-businesses8

reddit.com/r/cybersecurity/comments/1b80zza/best_siem_solution_for_small_company8

underdefense.com/blog/siem-solutions-comparison8

nohack.net/best-siem-tools-small-businesses-20267

subrosacyber.com/blog/best-siem-reddit7

capterra.com/siem-software/s/small-businesses6

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Huntress Managed SIEM's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Huntress Managed SIEM, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at huntress.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.