Small business▼−5Since September 2026: 9% → 4%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 9% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 6 pointsRank 4 → 5 of 71
Huntress · 1 category · RankedHuntress Managed SIEM
35Judge labels
3First choices
1Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
5% in SIEM for small business buyers
Rank 22 of 61 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 3 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business5 of 79
5%30 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market22 of 61
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise29 of 61
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In siem · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Huntress Managed SIEM for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SIEM platforms | Security operations | 0% | 22 of 61 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Sentinel at 38% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Huntress Managed SIEM held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · SIEM · by segment
Mid-market▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 7 → 19 of 55
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 20 → 23 of 51
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SIEM | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 7 → 22 of 61 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Huntress Managed SIEM across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Huntress Managed SIEM across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct7 labelsNone
Paraphrase6 labelsNone
Comparative6 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained5 labelsNone
Scale-constrained6 labels3
Negative5 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative35 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Highly popular in the mid-market/SMB space. They focus heavily on simplicity, highly predictable pricing, and human-vetted alerts” Gemini 3.5 Flash · SIEM · scale prompt · alternative
“Huntress addresses this by pairing its lightweight, highly-effective log collection with a 24/7 human SOC.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · SIEM · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Huntress Managed SIEM, over the 35 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Huntress Managed SIEM was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Huntress Managed SIEM, over the 35 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Huntress Managed SIEM was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Huntress Managed SIEM. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 35 of the 35 answers that named Huntress Managed SIEM and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
q-sec.com29
paloaltonetworks.com21
sentinelone.com20
underdefense.com15
g2.com12
huntress.comYour site12
solutionsinsider.com12
blumira.com11
kaseya.com11
logmanager.com10
141 of the 153 domain citations in answers naming Huntress Managed SIEM came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
huntress.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Huntress Managed SIEM takes 0% of first choices and Microsoft Sentinel takes 38%.ShowHide
Search and answers
huntress.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Huntress Managed SIEM takes 0% of first choices and Microsoft Sentinel takes 38%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “siem platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “siem platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 70 a month (“huntress managed siem”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 2 a month
- Its company's site
- huntress.com shared with Huntress's other products; the figures are the site's
- Organic visits to its site
- about 352,368 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 27,922 · 2,764 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 8,631
- Paid Google search
- 24 searches its ads show for, about 681 clicks and $15,522 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 22 of 61 in SIEM
Segment leader
38%
Microsoft Sentinel
- First choices
- 3 across its categories
- Named in
- 35 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 35 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as Huntress Managed SIEM
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Huntress Managed SIEM; a claim can dispute any of them.
Huntress 1Huntress (Managed SIEM) 1
Follow Huntress Managed SIEM
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Huntress is the company behind Huntress Managed SIEM.ShowHide
The company
Huntress is the company behind Huntress Managed SIEM.
ShowHideOn record
Company recordsIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Managed threat response and robust compliance support at a predictable price.
- For
- organizations like yours
- Price stated
- transparent pricing huntress.com/siem-guide
- Free plan or trial
- Try Huntress for Free huntress.com/siem-guide
- Customers named
- Darkhorse TechCohere HealthKey MethodsLightbulb NetworksDominant Systems CorporationRudick Innovation and TechnologySolis SecurityBlue Tree Technology
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, integrations, certifications, hosting
What Huntress Managed SIEM's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: huntress.com/siem-guide, huntress.com/siem-free-trial, huntress.com/pricing/siem, huntress.com/platform/siem, huntress.com/siem-guide/siem-tools. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Huntress Managed SIEM's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Huntress Managed SIEM, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Huntress Managed SIEM by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Huntress Managed SIEM is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Huntress Managed SIEM, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.