Ten of fourteen models named Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response first on the direct prompt; one named Huntress Managed EDR. Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Huntress Managed EDR by thirteen and Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response carries 40 labels and Huntress Managed EDR 30, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in six categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the managed detection and response page.
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response and Huntress Managed EDR were named in the same answer fifty-three times, of the 106 answers naming Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response and the 294 naming Huntress Managed EDR. In those answers Huntress Managed EDR took the first choice twenty-nine times and Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response ten.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“Excellent quality, but requires ~$25K–$44K minimum annual contract—not great for small budgets” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“or Arctic Wolf (~$44K/year minimum, or $60–$100/user/year)” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · soft negative
“higher‑touch support, but premium price” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · soft negative
“1. Arctic Wolf ... making it especially popular with mid-market organizations that want enterprise-level security operations without building a full SOC.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“The Best Overall Recommendation: Arctic Wolf ... is usually the safest bet for a "set it and forget it" partnership model” GLM 4.7 FlashX · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“### 1. Arctic Wolf (Best for "Concierge" Support) Arctic Wolf is frequently rated highly for mid-market organizations” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“The best MDR service for a company with a limited budget is Huntress, as it delivers human-verified MDR at a price point that works for small-market budgets.” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
“1. Huntress - Strong reputation for mid-market B2B companies ... I'd recommend requesting demos from Huntress, Sophos, and Arctic Wolf” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“For tightest budget, Huntress offers some of the most transparent and affordable pricing specifically designed for small businesses.” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.