IT AI Index

Index › Products › OWASP Secure Coding Dojo · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

OWASP Secure Coding Dojo

15Judge labels

1First choices

4Negative labels

5 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

6 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. OWASP Secure Coding Dojo was named 6 times in Secure code training, where SecureFlag led with 26%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business26 of 87

under the label threshold

Mid-market9 of 97

under the label threshold

Enterprise34 of 65

under the label threshold

In secure code training · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named OWASP Secure Coding Dojo for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Secure code training	Developer platform	2%	9 of 97	17%	6	under 10 labels · led by SecureFlag at 26%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for OWASP Secure Coding Dojo yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated OWASP Secure Coding Dojo across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	2	1	0	3
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	0	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	1	1
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase3 labelsNone

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained4 labels1

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative3 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative15 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Top Recommendation: OWASP Secure Coding Dojo (Free)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Secure code training · budget prompt · first choice

“Choose OWASP Secure Coding Dojo if you want a standards-based, lower-cost, lighter-weight training model.” GPT-5.4 mini · Secure code training · comparative prompt · alternative

“An open-source training platform originally developed by Trend Micro and donated to OWASP.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Secure code training · budget prompt · alternative

“Best open/community option: OWASP Secure Coding Dojo” GPT-5.4 mini · Secure code training · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“OWASP's Secure Coding Dojo is a training project, but OWASP says organizations should ideally deploy it themselves rather than use the demo site for team logins.” GPT-6 Luna · Secure code training · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as OWASP Secure Coding Dojo, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and OWASP Secure Coding Dojo was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

SecureFlag10 of 156Not among the top eight

Secure Code Warrior7 of 151Not among the top eight

Security Journey3 of 150Not among the top eight

Snyk Learn3 of 150Not among the top eight

PortSwigger Web Security Academy2 of 152Not among the top eight

Hacksplaining2 of 150Not among the top eight

Kontra2 of 150Not among the top eight

SafeStack Academy2 of 150Not among the top eight

OWASP's Application Security Curriculum and Developer Guide1 of 151Not among the top eight

OpenSSF "Developing Secure Software"1 of 151Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named OWASP Secure Coding Dojo. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 15 of the 15 answers that named OWASP Secure Coding Dojo and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

devguide.owasp.orgYour site12

owasp.orgYour site6

securecodewarrior.com5

secureflag.owasp.orgYour site5

blog.secureflag.com4

securityjourney.com3

appsecengineer.com2

learn.snyk.io2

nist.gov2

nvlpubs.nist.gov2

Twenty of the forty-three domain citations in answers naming OWASP Secure Coding Dojo came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

devguide.owasp.org/en/07-training-education/02-secure-coding-dojo12

owasp.org/projects/secure-coding-dojo5

blog.secureflag.com/2026/09/25/best-secure-coding-training-platforms4

securecodewarrior.com/product/learning4

secureflag.owasp.org/pricing/small-business3

appsecengineer.com/blog/5-hands-on-security-training-platforms-that-wont-make-you-wait-for2

nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/specialpublications/nist.sp.800-218.pdf2

owasp.org/projects/application-security-curriculum2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

owasp.org ranks 8 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, OWASP Secure Coding Dojo takes 2% of first choices and SecureFlag takes 26%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “secure code training platform”

Position for “secure code training platforms”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 20 a month (“owasp secure coding dojo”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 0 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 365,222 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 104,405 · 3,003 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 65,251
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on Google

None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 9 of 97 in secure code training

Segment leader

26%

SecureFlag

First choices: 1 across its categories
Named in: 15 answers
Its own site cited: in 15 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on owasp.org

893

subdomains included

Content

154

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

30 · 216

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest
Blog	86	0	2025-08-05
Conference or event	35	0	2025-11-14
News or press	18	0	2024-11-20
Webinar or virtual event	7	0	2026-05-13
Podcast or video	4	undated
Template or tool	3	0	2024-05-08
Glossary or explainer	1	undated

Most recent

2026-05-13Gen ai project application security risk virtual summit webinar or virtual event
2025-11-14Genai security project agentic ai summit europe conference or event
2025-08-30Genai security project uae summit hackathon conference or event
2025-08-28Owasp 2025 global appsec usa washington dc conference or event
2025-08-27Gen ai application security risk virtual conference webinar or virtual event
2025-08-06Owasp genai agentic security top 10 global kick off livestream webinar or virtual event

Events in person

Upcoming

November 5, 2026 to November 6, 2026OWASP Global AppSec USA 2026Hyatt Regency San Francisco, San Francisco, USA · hosts

Last twelve months

March 25, 2026OWASP GenAI Security Summit 2026 @ RSAC 2026 – Safeguarding GenAI Agents & Anonymous Risk in 2026Moscone Conference Center – Moscone South – Room 303, San Francisco, USA · hosted
March 25, 2026OWASP GenAI Security Open Workshop & Agentic Hackathon at RSAC’26DigitalJungleSF, 972 Mission St, San Francisco, USA · hosted
March 25, 2026OWASP GenAI Security RSAC’26 Jungle Party of The CenturyDigitalJungleSF, 972 Mission St, San Francisco, USA · attended
March 23, 2026OWASP GenAI Security – RSAC’26 Kickoff PartyJames Bong Building, Market St Floor 2, San Francisco, USA · hosted

As the event pages on owasp.org state them, read September 28, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page owasp.org exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as OWASP Secure Coding Dojo

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as OWASP Secure Coding Dojo; a claim can dispute any of them.

OWASP's Secure Coding Dojo 2

Follow OWASP Secure Coding Dojo

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when OWASP Secure Coding Dojo's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as OWASP Secure Coding Dojo, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for OWASP Secure Coding Dojo by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where OWASP Secure Coding Dojo is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name OWASP Secure Coding Dojo, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.