Index › Products › Grip Security ITDR 2.0 · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Grip Security ITDR 2.0

6Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

2 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

2 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Grip Security ITDR 2.0 was named 2 times in ITDR, where Huntress Managed ITDR led with 51%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business13 of 79

under the label threshold

Mid-market39 of 105

under the label threshold

Enterprise28 of 91

under the label threshold

In itdr · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Grip Security ITDR 2.0 for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Identity threat detection and response	Identity and access	0%	39 of 105	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Huntress Managed ITDR at 51%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Grip Security ITDR 2.0 yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Grip Security ITDR 2.0 across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative4 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative6 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Grip Security focuses on real time coverage across managed and unmanaged SaaS” Muse Glimmer 30B · ITDR · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Grip Security ITDR 2.0, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Grip Security ITDR 2.0 was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Huntress Managed ITDR4 of 62Not among the top eight

CrowdStrike Falcon Identity Protection3 of 60Not among the top eight

Microsoft Entra ID Protection2 of 61Not among the top eight

Semperis Directory Services Protector2 of 61Not among the top eight

CyberArk Identity Security Platform2 of 60Not among the top eight

Okta Identity Threat Protection2 of 60Not among the top eight

Silverfort ITDR2 of 60Not among the top eight

Vectra AI ITDR2 of 60Not among the top eight

Microsoft Defender XDR1 of 61Not among the top eight

Microsoft Defender for Identity / Microsoft Entra ID Protection1 of 61Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Grip Security ITDR 2.0. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 6 of the 6 answers that named Grip Security ITDR 2.0 and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

expertinsights.com6

startupstash.com6

cybersecuritynews.com5

huntress.com5

cyberpress.org4

cynet.com4

download.manageengine.com4

gbhackers.com3

microsoft.com3

assets.beyondtrust.com2

Forty-two of the forty-two domain citations in answers naming Grip Security ITDR 2.0 came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

expertinsights.com/identity-and-access-management/the-top-identity-threat-detection-and-re6

startupstash.com/top-identity-threat-detection-and-response-platforms6

cyberpress.org/itdr-solutions-by-business-size4

cybersecuritynews.com/best-identity-threat-detection-and-response-solutions4

cynet.com/security-foundations/identity-security/itdr-vendors4

download.manageengine.com/active-directory-360/analyst-reports/kuppingercole-itdr-leadersh4

gbhackers.com/itdr-solutions-compared-features-pricing3

huntress.com/itdr-guide/best-itdr-vendors3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

grip.security is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Grip Security ITDR 2.0 takes 0% of first choices and Huntress Managed ITDR takes 51%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “itdr solution”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “itdr solutions”

–

not in the top ten

Organic visits to its site: about 5,249 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 1,377 · 36 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 1,079
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

36 ads · 30 text, 6 image · 17 shown in the last 30 days

First shown July 2025, as Young-Sae Song, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 22 in the year, 14 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 39 of 105 in ITDR

Segment leader

51%

Huntress Managed ITDR

First choices: 0 across its categories
Named in: 6 answers
Its own site cited: in 6 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on grip.security

507

subdomains included

Content

433

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

8 · 6

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	277	79	2026-10-01	SSPM, ITDR
Glossary or explainer	71	3	2026-10-01	SSPM, ASM
Comparison	21	8	2026-10-01	SSPM, ITDR
Case study	20	undated		Email security, TPRM
News or press	19	undated		ITDR, SSPM
Report or ebook	12	undated		ITDR, SSPM
Template or tool	7	2	2026-09-28
Webinar or virtual event	4	undated
Conference or event	2	undated

Most recent

2026-10-01Ai risk in saas environments blog
2026-10-01Casb vs sspm itdr comparison
2026-10-01Oauth token risk saas blind spot blog
2026-10-01Rule of 17 ai agent security blog
2026-10-01What is sspm glossary or explainer
2026-09-29Claude compliance api ai governance blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page grip.security exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name SSPM (26); 10 name the category the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Grip Security ITDR 2.0

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Grip Security ITDR 2.0's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Grip Security ITDR 2.0, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Grip Security ITDR 2.0 by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Grip Security ITDR 2.0 is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Grip Security ITDR 2.0, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.