Index › Products › Google Workspace Gemini · October 2026 Edition

Google Cloud · 1 category · Named, not ranked

Google Workspace Gemini

4Judge labels

0First choices

1Negative labels

4 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

1 label, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Google Workspace Gemini was named 1 time in Enterprise AI, where ChatGPT led with 25%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business96 of 118

under the label threshold

Mid-market62 of 145

under the label threshold

Enterprise46 of 132

under the label threshold

In enterprise ai · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Google Workspace Gemini for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Enterprise AI assistants	Data platform	0%	62 of 145	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by ChatGPT at 25%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Google Workspace Gemini yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Google Workspace Gemini across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative4 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Gemini is the go‑to for Google Workspace users seeking native integration and multi‑modal support.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Enterprise AI · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Google Workspace Gemini, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Google Workspace Gemini was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

ChatGPT4 of 42Not among the top eight

Claude4 of 40Not among the top eight

Microsoft 365 Copilot2 of 41Not among the top eight

Glean2 of 40Not among the top eight

Microsoft Copilot2 of 40Not among the top eight

Amazon Q1 of 41Not among the top eight

Databricks Mosaic AI1 of 40Not among the top eight

IBM watsonx1 of 40Not among the top eight

Perplexity Enterprise Pro1 of 40Not among the top eight

Slack AI1 of 40Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Google Workspace Gemini. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 4 answers that named Google Workspace Gemini and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

coworker.ai2

lindy.ai2

resources.rework.com2

anthropic.com1

aws.amazon.com1

businesswire.com1

cdn-dynmedia-1.microsoft.com1

cloudzero.com1

copilotconsulting.com1

customgpt.ai1

Thirteen of the thirteen domain citations in answers naming Google Workspace Gemini came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

lindy.ai/blog/the-5-best-ai-assistants-for-work-and-play2

resources.rework.com/tools/ai-tools/best-ai-tools-for-enterprise-20262

anthropic.com/news/updates-to-our-consumer-terms1

aws.amazon.com/q/pricing1

businesswire.com/news/home/20260928656442/en/New-Hyperscience-Report-Finds-That-Enterprise1

cdn-dynmedia-1.microsoft.com/is/content/microsoftcorp/microsoft/bade/documents/products-an1

cloudzero.com/blog/gemini-pricing1

copilotconsulting.com/insights/copilot-vs-chatgpt-vs-claude-vs-gemini-vs-perplexity-enterp1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Follow Google Workspace Gemini

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Google Cloud is the company behind Google Workspace Gemini.

ShowHide

On record

Company records

Also from Google Cloud: Google 2-Step Verification, Google Alerts, Google AlloyDB for PostgreSQL, Google Analytics, Google Antigravity, Google Artifact Registry, Google AutoML, Google BigQuery ML and 84 more

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Google Workspace Gemini's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Google Workspace Gemini, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Google Workspace Gemini by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Google Workspace Gemini is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Google Workspace Gemini, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.