Index › Products › Gemini for Workspace · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Gemini for Workspace

7Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

4 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

4 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Gemini for Workspace was named 4 times in Enterprise AI, where ChatGPT led with 25%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business23 of 118

under the label threshold

Mid-market25 of 145

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In enterprise ai · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Gemini for Workspace for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Enterprise AI assistants	Data platform	0%	25 of 145	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by ChatGPT at 25%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Gemini for Workspace yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Gemini for Workspace across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	2	0	2
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative4 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative7 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best for: Google Workspace organizations. "Gemini for Google Workspace organizations."” Muse Glimmer 30B · Enterprise AI · comparative prompt · alternative

“Gemini for Workspace — best if Google Workspace is your backbone.” GPT-5.4 mini · Enterprise AI · direct prompt · alternative

“If you live in Google Workspace → Gemini Enterprise.” GPT-5.4 mini · Enterprise AI · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Gemini for Workspace, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Gemini for Workspace was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

ChatGPT5 of 73Not among the top eight

Microsoft 365 Copilot4 of 72Not among the top eight

Google Gemini4 of 70Not among the top eight

Amazon Q3 of 70Not among the top eight

Microsoft Copilot3 of 70Not among the top eight

Claude2 of 70Not among the top eight

Claude for Enterprise1 of 71Not among the top eight

OpenAI ChatGPT Enterprise1 of 71Not among the top eight

Aisera1 of 70Not among the top eight

Anthropic Claude Enterprise1 of 70Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Gemini for Workspace. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 7 answers that named Gemini for Workspace and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

microsoft.com3

coworker.ai2

help.openai.com2

resources.rework.com2

aws.amazon.com1

business.udemy.com1

codecones.com1

customgpt.ai1

dancumberlandlabs.com1

enterprisedna.co1

No domain is on file for Gemini for Workspace, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

coworker.ai/blog/best-enterprise-ai-assistant-20262

microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365-copilot/copilot-vs-gemini-enterprise2

resources.rework.com/tools/ai-tools/best-ai-tools-for-enterprise-20262

aws.amazon.com/smart-business/resources-for-smb/ai-readiness-checklist1

business.udemy.com/blog/ai-readiness-checklist1

codecones.com/blog/ai-assistant-evaluation-dataset-checklist1

customgpt.ai/ai-assistant1

dancumberlandlabs.com/blog/chatgpt-plus-vs-enterprise1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Gemini for Workspace

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Gemini for Workspace; a claim can dispute any of them.

Google Gemini Enterprise / Gemini for Workspace 2Gemini for Workspace / Gemini Enterprise 1

Follow Gemini for Workspace

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Gemini for Workspace's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Gemini for Workspace, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Gemini for Workspace by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Gemini for Workspace is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Gemini for Workspace, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.