AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Everpure · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Everpure

7Judge labels
1First choices
0Negative labels
4 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
4 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Everpure was named 4 times in Enterprise storage, where Dell PowerStore led with 16%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In enterprise storage · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Everpure for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Enterprise storage systemsCloud and infrastructure0%37 of 1670%4under 10 labels · led by Dell PowerStore at 16%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Everpure yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Everpure across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.510001
GPT-5.4 mini00101
Gemini 3.5 Flash10001
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B10001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 label1
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative5 labels5not counted in share
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative7 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 6 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Everpure sits highest in ability to execute and furthest in completeness of vision for the second consecutive year” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Enterprise storage · comparative prompt · first choice
“Choose Everpure if you want the lowest possible operational overhead, maximum rack/energy efficiency” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Enterprise storage · comparative prompt · first choice
“In short: Everpure leads on vision, simplicity and Evergreen subscription” Muse Glimmer 30B · Enterprise storage · comparative prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Everpure, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Everpure was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
NetApp AFF6 of 71Not among the top eight
Dell Technologies6 of 70Not among the top eight
HPE6 of 70Not among the top eight
IBM6 of 70Not among the top eight
Huawei OceanStor5 of 70Not among the top eight
Hitachi Vantara3 of 70Not among the top eight
Scality RING2 of 70Not among the top eight
TrueNAS1 of 71Not among the top eight
Amazon Web Services1 of 70Not among the top eight
Ceph1 of 70Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Everpure. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 7 answers that named Everpure and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

storagereview.com6
gartner.com5
hpe.com4
en.wikipedia.org3
everpuredata.comYour site3
netapp.com3
prnewswire.com3
solutionsreview.com3
6sense.com2
access.on.ca2

Thirty-one of the thirty-four domain citations in answers naming Everpure came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

everpuredata.com ranks 6 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Everpure takes 0% of first choices and Dell PowerStore takes 16%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “enterprise storage array”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “enterprise storage systems”
–
not in the top ten

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 37 of 167 in enterprise storage
Segment leader
16%
Dell PowerStore
First choices
1 across its categories
Named in
7 answers
Its own site cited
in 7 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on everpuredata.com
12,591
subdomains included
Content
7,228
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
543 · 578
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog1,87482026-09-30Object storage, ASM
News or press1,71792026-10-01Object storage
Webinar or virtual event1,233582026-10-28Object storage, SIEM
Case study83902024-09-21
Glossary or explainer83042026-09-25Object storage, SIEM
Podcast or video44332026-09-29Data warehouses, Orchestration
Comparison18742026-07-30MFA, ZTNA
Conference or event9312026-08-05
Template or tool12undated

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page everpuredata.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name object storage (35); 0 name the category the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as Everpure

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Everpure; a claim can dispute any of them.
Everpure (formerly Pure Storage) 1

Follow Everpure

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Everpure is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Unified Data Platform for Apps, Analytics, and AI
Customers named
Atlantic Health SystemNASARed LobsterSiriusXMServiceNowVirgin Media O2NissanOlympus
Not stated on the pages read
Who it is for, price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting

What Everpure's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: everpuredata.com, everpuredata.com/platform.html. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Everpure's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Everpure, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Everpure by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Everpure is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Everpure, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at everpuredata.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.